Amforc/3 — Polkadot Validator Performance

Amforc/3 ✓ Reasonable Poor

Switzerland, Opfikon

Backed by 1 nomination pool · browse them

Slot

#700

Commission

15%

Nominators

Stake

872.9K DOT

Updated

2h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Poor)

Active Set Longevity

52 days

15.1% uptime (last 12 months)

Current streak: 0 days

Longest streak: 17 days

Commission Stability

65/100

Moderate

Change frequency: 1 per 90 days

Volatility: 3.8%

Last changed: 2026-03-21 15:00:05

Expected Returns Details

Not active

No recent exposure

Not in active set

Last active: era 2122 (71 eras ago)

Click to see historical chart

Validator Self-Stake

10,000 DOT

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

393.9 DOT

Total income · 2026-03

● Comm 379.4 ● Self 14.6

Rewards distributed: 4,946 DOT

vs last month: ↗ +89.1%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Medium

Avg slot: 693.8 (30 days)

90-day avg: 654.7

180-day avg: 624.9

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

✅ All rewards claimed

Total unclaimed: 0/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

6/10

Moderate

Health Score: 38.08/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

3/10

Low risk

⚠ Threshold risk

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 2122 Details

A+

MVR: 0.28% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

58/100

Moderate

Stable nominators: 10

Unstable nominators: 4

Total nominators: 36

Stable percentage: 27.8%

Active Set Risk Details

10/10

High risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 31.2% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #700 → #800 (would drop out!)

Risk: CRITICAL

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 56.8% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: CRITICAL

Node DHT

dot3

Parity Polkadot v1.21.2

Network: litep2p

IPv6: ✓ Supported

Multi-homed: ✓ Yes

Source: DHT discovery (telemetry not available)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 6/10 risk = 10 - (38.08/10)

Health Score Breakdown (38.08/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 11.27/30

Longevity: 2.3/15 pts
52 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 6.5/10 pts
1 commission changes over 180 days
Slot Volatility: 2.5/5 pts
StdDev 50.0 → 2.5 pts (Moderate volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 14.99/33

Era Points Consistency: 0.0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 10.0/10 pts
Grade A+ = 10.0 pts
MVR: 5.0/5 pts
0.28% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -0.0 pts penalty
No unclaimed eras

3. Growth (20 points) 10.0/20

APY Relative Score: 5.0/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 13.0/32

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: Amforc/3
Commission Transparency: 0.0/5 pts
1 commission changes in 180 days (0 pts)
Grade Trend: 0.0/5 pts
Grade declined (0 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
No public telemetry
Self-Stake Confidence: 1.0/5 pts
Low commitment (1-5% self-stake)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 7.83/20

Nominator Stability: 5.8/10 pts
27.8% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 2.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 100 slots
Aggregate Risk: 0.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 150 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Switzerland
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 7.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
v1.21.2-00fbc91e415 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 3.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 70.09/146

Normalized Health Score: 38.08/100

Risk Score: 6/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

MODERATE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

27.8%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

42%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

10 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

4 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

27.8% Stable 42% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Moderate Risk: Your nominator base has moderate stability. While 10 nominators have been with you long-term, 4 are relatively new (<90 days). Focus on building relationships with your newer nominators to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

10/10

HIGH RISK

Current Position

#700

in active set

Safety Buffer

-200

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

31.2%

of your stake

→

New Position

#800

▼ 100 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

WOULD DROP OUT! - Loss of this nominator would kick you out of the active set

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 56.8%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 31.2%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income
URGENT: Your buffer is critically low. Focus on attracting new nominators immediately

Amforc/3 ✓ Reasonable Poor Switzerland, Opfikon

Performance Metrics (Health: Poor)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Health Score Breakdown (38.08/100)

💰 Reward Claims Status

Current Status

Last 30 Eras Timeline

Payment Speed

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

Current Risk Level

How to Improve Nominator Stability

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

Recent Nominator Behavior

How to Reduce Risk