P2P.ORG/29 - Polkadot Validator Performance

P2P.ORG/29 ✓ Reasonable Fair

Netherlands (Kingdom of the), Amsterdam

Part of P2PORG cluster - 13 validators · 2.17% of active set · Manage this fleet →

Slot

#645

Commission

0% · fixed

Nominators

268

Stake

3.64M DOT

Updated

46m ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Active Set Longevity

363 days

99.2% uptime (363 of 366 observed days)

Current streak: 0 days

Longest streak: 363 days

Expected Returns Details

Not in active set — last active era 2322 (2 eras ago)

2.7% →

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Last active-era rate (era 2322): 2.6%

Trend: stable

Avg era reward: 69,217 DOT

Avg assigned stake: 1,606,511 DOT

Avg era point share: 0.17%

Based on 25 eras (chart covers 83)

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

20,225 DOT

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

555.9 DOT

Total income · 2026-10

● Comm 0.0 ● Self 10.1

Rewards distributed: 1,623 DOT

vs last month: ↘ -60.0%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

High

Avg slot: 213.9 (30 days)

90-day avg: 273.4

180-day avg: 268.2

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

✅ All rewards claimed

Total unclaimed: 0/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

4/10

Moderate

Health Score: 63.12/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

5/10

Moderate risk

⚠ Threshold risk

⚠ Low era points

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 2322 Details

A+

MVR: 0.55% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

86/100

Excellent

Stable nominators: 212

Unstable nominators: 18

Total nominators: 268

Stable percentage: 79.1%

Active Set Risk Details

10/10

High risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 16.8% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #645 → #695 (would drop out!)

Risk: CRITICAL

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 24.7% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: CRITICAL

Node DHT

scm-ams3-polkadot-validator-19-0

Parity Polkadot v1.22.1

Network: litep2p

IPv6: -

Multi-homed: -

Source: DHT discovery (telemetry not available)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 4/10 risk = 10 - (63.12/10)

Health Score Breakdown (63.12/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (20 points) 14.88/20

Longevity: 14.9/15 pts
363 days in active set over last 365 days
Slot Volatility: 0/5 pts
StdDev 140.1 → 0.0 pts (High volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 14.97/33

Era Points Consistency: 0.0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 10.0/10 pts
Grade A+ = 10.0 pts
MVR: 5.0/5 pts
0.55% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -0.0 pts penalty
No unclaimed eras

3. Growth (20 points) 7.23/20

APY Relative Score: 2.2/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (27 points) 17.0/27

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: P2P.ORG/29
Grade Trend: 5.0/5 pts
Grade improved (5 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
No public telemetry
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 16.62/20

Nominator Stability: 8.6/10 pts
79.1% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 4.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 50 slots
Aggregate Risk: 4.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 40 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 7.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
v1.22.1-f8cfbb96055 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 3.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 83.70/146

Normalized Health Score: 63.12/100

Risk Score: 4/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

EXCELLENT

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

212

79.1%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

14%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

212 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

18 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

79.1% Stable 14% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Low Risk: You have an excellent stable nominator base. 79.1% of your nominators have been with you for 90+ days, indicating strong commitment and trust. This stability provides a strong foundation for maintaining your active set position.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

10/10

HIGH RISK

Current Position

#645

in active set

Safety Buffer

-95

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

16.8%

of your stake

→

New Position

#695

▼ 50 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

WOULD DROP OUT! - Loss of this nominator would kick you out of the active set

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 24.7%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 16.8%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income
URGENT: Your buffer is critically low. Focus on attracting new nominators immediately

P2P.ORG/29 ✓ Reasonable Fair Netherlands (Kingdom of the), Amsterdam