pos.dog/36 - Polkadot Validator Performance

pos.dog/36 ✓ Reasonable Fair

Finland, Helsinki (Hetzner Online GmbH)

Part of POSDOG cluster - 40 validators · 6.67% of active set · Manage this fleet →

Backed by 1 nomination pool · browse them

Slot

#361

Commission

0% · fixed

Nominators

Stake

20.37M DOT

Updated

9m ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Active Set Longevity

319 days

100.0% uptime (319 of 319 observed days)

Current streak: 319 days

Longest streak: 319 days

Expected Returns Details

2.7% →

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 2.6%

Trend: stable

Avg era reward: 69,216 DOT

Avg assigned stake: 1,585,582 DOT

Avg era point share: 0.17%

Based on 27 eras (chart covers 85)

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

10,003 DOT

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

40.0 DOT

Total income · 2026-09

● Comm 0.0 ● Self 0.7

Rewards distributed: 113 DOT

vs last month: ↘ -96.9%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Medium

Avg slot: 338.5 (30 days)

90-day avg: 363.1

180-day avg: 334.7

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

⚠️ 1 era overdue

Overdue (affects health score)

Total unclaimed: 2/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

3/10

Safe

Health Score: 68.87/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

0/10

No risks detected

✓ No risk flags

⚠️ Unpaid Rewards: 1 era overdue

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 2278 Details

A+

MVR: 0.08% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

54/100

Moderate

Stable nominators: 5

Unstable nominators: 3

Total nominators: 25

Stable percentage: 20.0%

Active Set Risk Details

3/10

Low risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 49.1% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #361 → #461 (moderate buffer)

Risk: MODERATE

Recent Nominator Changes:

✓ 1.0% from recent switchers

Stable nominator base

Risk: LOW

Node Telemetry

PosDog/36

Parity Polkadot 1.22.4

Peers: 44

Propagation: 390ms

Last snapshot: 2026-08-31 04:32:02

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 3/10 risk = 10 - (68.87/10)

Health Score Breakdown (68.87/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (20 points) 15.15/20

Longevity: 15.0/15 pts
319 days in active set over last 365 days
Slot Volatility: 0.1/5 pts
StdDev 96.9 → 0.2 pts (Moderate volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 17.28/33

Era Points Consistency: 4.3/15 pts
High era points variance
Turboflakes Grade: 10.0/10 pts
Grade A+ = 10.0 pts
MVR: 5.0/5 pts
0.08% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -2.0 pts penalty
-2.0 pts penalty (1 overdue eras past grace period)

3. Growth (20 points) 7.43/20

APY Relative Score: 2.4/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (27 points) 22.0/27

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: pos.dog/36
Grade Trend: 5.0/5 pts
Grade improved (5 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 5.0/5 pts
Public telemetry available (5 pts)
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 12.4/20

Nominator Stability: 5.4/10 pts
20.0% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 2.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 100 slots
Aggregate Risk: 5.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 10 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Finland
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 8.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
1.22.4-82af15d17fd = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 4.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 88.26/146

Normalized Health Score: 68.87/100

Risk Score: 3/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

MODERATE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

20.0%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

46%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

5 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

3 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

20.0% Stable 46% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Moderate Risk: Your nominator base has moderate stability. While 5 nominators have been with you long-term, 3 are relatively new (<90 days). Focus on building relationships with your newer nominators to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

3/10

LOW RISK

Current Position

#361

in active set

Safety Buffer

139

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

49.1%

of your stake

→

New Position

#461

▼ 100 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

Moderate Buffer - Would remain in active set but closer to the edge (139 slot buffer)

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 1.0%

What This Means:

Stable Base - Very few nominators have recently switched to you, indicating a stable, committed nominator base

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 49.1%)
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income

pos.dog/36 ✓ Reasonable Fair Finland, Helsinki (Hetzner Online GmbH)

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Health Score Breakdown (68.87/100)

💰 Reward Claims Status

Current Status

Last 30 Eras Timeline

Payment Speed

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

Current Risk Level

How to Improve Nominator Stability

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

Recent Nominator Behavior

How to Reduce Risk