Zug Capital/05 - Polkadot Validator Performance

Zug Capital/05 ✓ Reasonable Fair

Switzerland, Beromünster (CKW Fiber Services AG)

Part of ZUGCAPITAL cluster - 8 validators · 1.33% of active set · Manage this fleet →

Backed by 2 nomination pools · browse them

Slot

#600

Commission

0% · fixed

Nominators

725

Stake

5.44M DOT

Updated

1h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Active Set Longevity

365 days

99.7% uptime (365 of 366 observed days)

Current streak: 208 days

Longest streak: 208 days

Expected Returns Details

Not in active set — last active era 2277 (1 eras ago)

2.7% →

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Last active-era rate (era 2277): 2.7%

Trend: stable

Avg era reward: 69,218 DOT

Avg assigned stake: 1,587,780 DOT

Avg era point share: 0.17%

Based on 25 eras (chart covers 83)

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

21,000 DOT

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

1,796.6 DOT

Total income · 2026-08

● Comm 0.0 ● Self 46.4

Rewards distributed: 3,533 DOT

vs last month: ↗ +7.0%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

High

Avg slot: 368.3 (30 days)

90-day avg: 337.7

180-day avg: 400.8

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

⚠️ 1 era overdue

Overdue (affects health score)

Total unclaimed: 1/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

4/10

Moderate

Health Score: 60.87/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

5/10

Moderate risk

⚠ Threshold risk

⚠ Low era points

⚠️ Unpaid Rewards: 1 era overdue

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 2277 Details

A+

MVR: 0.0% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

58/100

Moderate

Stable nominators: 154

Unstable nominators: 28

Total nominators: 725

Stable percentage: 21.2%

Active Set Risk Details

10/10

High risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 49.8% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #600 → #700 (would drop out!)

Risk: CRITICAL

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 26.5% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: CRITICAL

Node DHT

dull-house-5105

Parity Polkadot v1.22.0

Network: litep2p

IPv6: -

Multi-homed: -

Source: DHT discovery (telemetry not available)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 4/10 risk = 10 - (60.87/10)

Health Score Breakdown (60.87/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (20 points) 14.96/20

Longevity: 15.0/15 pts
365 days in active set over last 365 days
Slot Volatility: 0/5 pts
StdDev 142.6 → 0.0 pts (High volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 13.0/33

Era Points Consistency: 0.0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 10.0/10 pts
Grade A+ = 10.0 pts
MVR: 5.0/5 pts
0.00% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -2.0 pts penalty
-2.0 pts penalty (1 overdue eras past grace period)

3. Growth (20 points) 8.91/20

APY Relative Score: 3.9/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (27 points) 15.0/27

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: Zug Capital/05
Grade Trend: 3.0/5 pts
Grade stable (3 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
No public telemetry
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 11.87/20

Nominator Stability: 5.9/10 pts
21.2% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 2.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 100 slots
Aggregate Risk: 4.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 40 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Switzerland
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 8.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
v1.22.0-2e4dd0bc223 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 4.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 77.74/146

Normalized Health Score: 60.87/100

Risk Score: 4/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

MODERATE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

154

21.2%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

42%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

154 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

28 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

21.2% Stable 42% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Moderate Risk: Your nominator base has moderate stability. While 154 nominators have been with you long-term, 28 are relatively new (<90 days). Focus on building relationships with your newer nominators to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

10/10

HIGH RISK

Current Position

#600

in active set

Safety Buffer

-100

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

49.8%

of your stake

→

New Position

#700

▼ 100 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

WOULD DROP OUT! - Loss of this nominator would kick you out of the active set

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 26.5%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 49.8%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income
URGENT: Your buffer is critically low. Focus on attracting new nominators immediately

Zug Capital/05 ✓ Reasonable Fair Switzerland, Beromünster (CKW Fiber Services AG)