1y3bTa...Xj48ybhW - Polkadot Validator Performance

1y3bTa...Xj48ybhW Fair

Canada, Montreal

Backed by 1 nomination pool · browse them

Slot

#326

Commission

0% · fixed

Nominators

Stake

17.59M DOT

Updated

45m ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Active Set Longevity

366 days

100.0% uptime (366 of 366 observed days)

Current streak: 366 days

Longest streak: 366 days

Expected Returns Details

2.5% ↗

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 2.7%

Trend: improving

Avg era reward: 69,218 DOT

Avg assigned stake: 1,716,971 DOT

Avg era point share: 0.17%

Based on 27 eras (chart covers 85)

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

30,001 DOT

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

1,123.1 DOT

Total income · 2026-10

● Comm 0.0 ● Self 34.9

Rewards distributed: 1,869 DOT

vs last month: ↘ -53.8%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Medium

Avg slot: 282.2 (30 days)

90-day avg: 228.9

180-day avg: 273.3

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

⚠️ 1 era overdue

Overdue (affects health score)

Total unclaimed: 1/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

5/10

Moderate

Health Score: 53.14/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

0/10

No risks detected

✓ No risk flags

⚠️ Unpaid Rewards: 1 era overdue

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 2324 Details

A+

MVR: 0.94% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

80/100

Excellent

Stable nominators: 59

Unstable nominators: 8

Total nominators: 85

Stable percentage: 69.4%

Active Set Risk Details

0/10

Low risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 24.2% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #326 → #376 (still safe)

Risk: LOW

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 5.2% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: LOW

Node DHT

FIGMENT-1 bhs-9

Parity Polkadot v1.22.1

Network: litep2p

IPv6: -

Multi-homed: -

Source: DHT discovery (telemetry not available)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 5/10 risk = 10 - (53.14/10)

Health Score Breakdown (53.14/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (20 points) 17.46/20

Longevity: 15.0/15 pts
366 days in active set over last 365 days
Slot Volatility: 2.5/5 pts
StdDev 50.9 → 2.5 pts (Moderate volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 13.83/33

Era Points Consistency: 0.9/15 pts
High era points variance
Turboflakes Grade: 10.0/10 pts
Grade A+ = 10.0 pts
MVR: 5.0/5 pts
0.94% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -2.0 pts penalty
-2.0 pts penalty (1 overdue eras past grace period)

3. Growth (20 points) 6.3/20

APY Relative Score: 1.3/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (27 points) 3.0/27

Identity Completeness: 0.0/12 pts
No on-chain identity
Grade Trend: 3.0/5 pts
Grade stable (3 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
No public telemetry
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 17.0/20

Nominator Stability: 8.0/10 pts
69.4% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 4.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 50 slots
Aggregate Risk: 5.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 10 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Canada
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 7.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
v1.22.1-f8cfbb96055 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 3.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 70.59/146

Normalized Health Score: 53.14/100

Risk Score: 5/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

EXCELLENT

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

69.4%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

20%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

59 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

8 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

69.4% Stable 20% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Low Risk: You have an excellent stable nominator base. 69.4% of your nominators have been with you for 90+ days, indicating strong commitment and trust. This stability provides a strong foundation for maintaining your active set position.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

0/10

LOW RISK

Current Position

#326

in active set

Safety Buffer

224

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

24.2%

of your stake

→

New Position

#376

▼ 50 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

Still Safe - Would remain well within active set with 224 slot buffer

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 5.2%

What This Means:

Some Turnover - Moderate amount of recent switchers. These nominators may be less committed and could leave for other validators

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 24.2%)
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income

1y3bTa...Xj48ybhW Fair Canada, Montreal

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Health Score Breakdown (53.14/100)

💰 Reward Claims Status

Current Status

Last 30 Eras Timeline

Payment Speed

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

Current Risk Level

How to Improve Nominator Stability

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

Recent Nominator Behavior

How to Reduce Risk