1Ehsfg...U1XxY8YA - Polkadot Validator Performance

1Ehsfg...U1XxY8YA Fair

United States of America, Philadelphia

Slot

#621

Commission

0% · fixed

Nominators

Stake

5.20M DOT

Updated

2h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Active Set Longevity

192 days

68.3% uptime (192 of 281 observed days)

Current streak: 0 days

Longest streak: 189 days

Expected Returns Details

3.1% →

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 3.1%

Trend: stable

Avg era reward: 69,214 DOT

Avg assigned stake: 1,375,283 DOT

Avg era point share: 0.17%

Based on 13 eras (chart covers 60)

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

100,000 DOT

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

636.6 DOT

Total income · 2026-10

● Comm 0.0 ● Self 57.5

Rewards distributed: 791 DOT

vs last month: ↘ -67.7%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Low

Avg slot: 624.3 (30 days)

90-day avg: 616.8

180-day avg: 589.9

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

✅ All rewards claimed

Total unclaimed: 0/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

4/10

Moderate

Health Score: 63.99/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

5/10

Moderate risk

⚠ Threshold risk

⚠ Low era points

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 2323 Details

A+

MVR: 0.31% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

100/100

Excellent

Stable nominators: 2

Unstable nominators: 0

Total nominators: 2

Stable percentage: 100.0%

Active Set Risk Details

10/10

High risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 98.1% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #621 → #821 (would drop out!)

Risk: CRITICAL

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 29.4% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: CRITICAL

Node DHT

vulgar-range-1979

Parity Polkadot v1.22.0

Network: litep2p

IPv6: ✓ Supported

Multi-homed: ✓ Yes

Source: DHT discovery (telemetry not available)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 4/10 risk = 10 - (63.99/10)

Health Score Breakdown (63.99/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (20 points) 14.74/20

Longevity: 10.2/15 pts
192 days in active set over last 365 days
Slot Volatility: 4.5/5 pts
StdDev 10.3 → 4.5 pts (Low volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 27.46/33

Era Points Consistency: 12.5/15 pts
Moderate era points variance
Turboflakes Grade: 10.0/10 pts
Grade A+ = 10.0 pts
MVR: 5.0/5 pts
0.31% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -0.0 pts penalty
No unclaimed eras

3. Growth (20 points) 12.63/20

APY Relative Score: 7.6/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (27 points) 4.0/27

Identity Completeness: 0.0/12 pts
No on-chain identity
Grade Trend: 3.0/5 pts
Grade stable (3 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
No public telemetry
Self-Stake Confidence: 1.0/5 pts
Low commitment (1-5% self-stake)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 14.0/20

Nominator Stability: 10.0/10 pts
100.0% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 0.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 200 slots
Aggregate Risk: 4.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 40 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: United States of America
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 7.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
v1.22.0-2e4dd0bc223 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 3.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 85.83/146

Normalized Health Score: 63.99/100

Risk Score: 4/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

100

EXCELLENT

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

100.0%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

2 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

0 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

100.0% Stable 0% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Low Risk: You have an excellent stable nominator base. 100.0% of your nominators have been with you for 90+ days, indicating strong commitment and trust. This stability provides a strong foundation for maintaining your active set position.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

10/10

HIGH RISK

Current Position

#621

in active set

Safety Buffer

-221

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

98.1%

of your stake

→

New Position

#821

▼ 200 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

WOULD DROP OUT! - Loss of this nominator would kick you out of the active set

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 29.4%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 98.1%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income
URGENT: Your buffer is critically low. Focus on attracting new nominators immediately

1Ehsfg...U1XxY8YA Fair United States of America, Philadelphia