P2P.ORG/2 - Polkadot Validator Performance

P2P.ORG/2 ✓ Reasonable Fair

Netherlands (Kingdom of the), Amsterdam

Part of P2PORG cluster - 13 validators · 2.17% of active set · Manage this fleet →

Backed by 10 nomination pools · browse them

Slot

#263

Commission

0% · fixed

Nominators

845

Stake

11.96M DOT

Updated

2h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Active Set Longevity

366 days

100.0% uptime (366 of 366 observed days)

Current streak: 366 days

Longest streak: 366 days

Expected Returns Details

2.6% →

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 2.6%

Trend: stable

Avg era reward: 69,216 DOT

Avg assigned stake: 1,609,463 DOT

Avg era point share: 0.17%

Based on 27 eras (chart covers 85)

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

10,001 DOT

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

631.5 DOT

Total income · 2026-10

● Comm 0.0 ● Self 11.5

Rewards distributed: 1,844 DOT

vs last month: ↘ -54.4%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Low

Avg slot: 277.7 (30 days)

90-day avg: 262.0

180-day avg: 255.4

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

✅ All rewards claimed

Total unclaimed: 0/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

4/10

Moderate

Health Score: 60.9/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

0/10

No risks detected

✓ No risk flags

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 2323 Details

MVR: 1.47% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

83/100

Excellent

Stable nominators: 594

Unstable nominators: 27

Total nominators: 845

Stable percentage: 70.3%

Active Set Risk Details

0/10

Low risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 21.1% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #263 → #313 (still safe)

Risk: LOW

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 36.2% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: LOW

Node DHT

scm-ams3-polkadot-validator-15-0

Parity Polkadot v1.22.1

Network: litep2p

IPv6: -

Multi-homed: -

Source: DHT discovery (telemetry not available)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 4/10 risk = 10 - (60.9/10)

Health Score Breakdown (60.9/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (20 points) 18.69/20

Longevity: 15.0/15 pts
366 days in active set over last 365 days
Slot Volatility: 3.7/5 pts
StdDev 26.3 → 3.7 pts (Low volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 12.93/33

Era Points Consistency: 0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 8.0/10 pts
Grade A = 8.0 pts
MVR: 4.9/5 pts
1.47% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -0.0 pts penalty
No unclaimed eras

3. Growth (20 points) 6.8/20

APY Relative Score: 1.8/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (27 points) 15.0/27

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: P2P.ORG/2
Grade Trend: 3.0/5 pts
Grade stable (3 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
No public telemetry
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 14.36/20

Nominator Stability: 8.4/10 pts
70.3% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 4.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 50 slots
Aggregate Risk: 2.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 80 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 7.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
v1.22.1-f8cfbb96055 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 3.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 80.78/146

Normalized Health Score: 60.9/100

Risk Score: 4/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

EXCELLENT

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

594

70.3%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

17%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

594 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

27 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

70.3% Stable 17% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Low Risk: You have an excellent stable nominator base. 70.3% of your nominators have been with you for 90+ days, indicating strong commitment and trust. This stability provides a strong foundation for maintaining your active set position.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

0/10

LOW RISK

Current Position

#263

in active set

Safety Buffer

287

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

21.1%

of your stake

→

New Position

#313

▼ 50 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

Still Safe - Would remain well within active set with 287 slot buffer

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 36.2%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 21.1%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income

P2P.ORG/2 ✓ Reasonable Fair Netherlands (Kingdom of the), Amsterdam

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Health Score Breakdown (60.9/100)

💰 Reward Claims Status

Current Status

Last 30 Eras Timeline

Payment Speed

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

Current Risk Level

How to Improve Nominator Stability

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

Recent Nominator Behavior

How to Reduce Risk