15vgF7...vVoDzuq6 - Polkadot Validator Performance

15vgF7...vVoDzuq6 Poor

Netherlands (Kingdom of the), Amsterdam

Backed by 4 nomination pools · browse them

Slot

#616

Commission

0% · fixed

Nominators

Stake

10.89M DOT

Updated

2h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Poor)

Active Set Longevity

272 days

74.3% uptime (272 of 366 observed days)

Current streak: 0 days

Longest streak: 186 days

Expected Returns

N/A

Awaiting data collection

Validator Self-Stake

10,001 DOT

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

641.2 DOT

Total income · 2026-07

● Comm 0.0 ● Self 21.5

Rewards distributed: 2,698 DOT

vs last month: ↘ -4.4%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Low

Avg slot: 620.0 (30 days)

90-day avg: 613.8

180-day avg: 559.5

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

✅ All rewards claimed

Total unclaimed: 0/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

5/10

Moderate

Health Score: 45.03/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

3/10

Low risk

⚠ Threshold risk

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 2235 Details

A+

MVR: 0.17% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

98/100

Excellent

Stable nominators: 26

Unstable nominators: 0

Total nominators: 27

Stable percentage: 96.3%

Active Set Risk Details

10/10

High risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 20.2% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #616 → #666 (would drop out!)

Risk: CRITICAL

Recent Nominator Changes:

✓ 0.0% from recent switchers

Stable nominator base

Risk: CRITICAL

Node DHT

scm-ams7-polkadot-validator-51-0

Parity Polkadot v1.22.1

Network: litep2p

IPv6: -

Multi-homed: ✓ Yes

Source: DHT discovery (telemetry not available)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 5/10 risk = 10 - (45.03/10)

Health Score Breakdown (45.03/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (20 points) 15.68/20

Longevity: 11.2/15 pts
272 days in active set over last 365 days
Slot Volatility: 4.5/5 pts
StdDev 9.4 → 4.5 pts (Low volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 14.99/33

Era Points Consistency: 0.0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 10.0/10 pts
Grade A+ = 10.0 pts
MVR: 5.0/5 pts
0.17% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -0.0 pts penalty
No unclaimed eras

3. Growth (20 points) 10.0/20

APY Relative Score: 5.0/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (27 points) 0.0/27

Identity Completeness: 0.0/12 pts
No on-chain identity
Grade Trend: 0.0/5 pts
Grade declined (0 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
No public telemetry
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 18.82/20

Nominator Stability: 9.8/10 pts
96.3% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 4.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 50 slots
Aggregate Risk: 5.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 10 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 7.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
v1.22.1-f8cfbb96055 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 3.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 72.49/146

Normalized Health Score: 45.03/100

Risk Score: 5/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

EXCELLENT

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

96.3%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

26 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

0 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

96.3% Stable 2% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Low Risk: You have an excellent stable nominator base. 96.3% of your nominators have been with you for 90+ days, indicating strong commitment and trust. This stability provides a strong foundation for maintaining your active set position.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

10/10

HIGH RISK

Current Position

#616

in active set

Safety Buffer

-66

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

20.2%

of your stake

→

New Position

#666

▼ 50 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

WOULD DROP OUT! - Loss of this nominator would kick you out of the active set

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 0.0%

What This Means:

Stable Base - Very few nominators have recently switched to you, indicating a stable, committed nominator base

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 20.2%)
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income
URGENT: Your buffer is critically low. Focus on attracting new nominators immediately

15vgF7...vVoDzuq6 Poor Netherlands (Kingdom of the), Amsterdam