Meria/02 - Polkadot Validator Performance

Meria/02 ✓ Reasonable Fair

France, Gravelines

Part of MERIA cluster - 7 validators · 1.17% of active set · Manage this fleet →

Paged exposure - 2 pages, 626 rewarded backers out of 1,027 total nominators (cap 512/page)

Backed by 1 nomination pool · browse them

Slot

#48

Commission

0% · fixed

Nominators

1027

Stake

19.90M DOT

Updated

49m ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Active Set Longevity

356 days

100.0% uptime (356 of 356 observed days)

Current streak: 356 days

Longest streak: 356 days

Expected Returns Details

2.5% ↘

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 1.8%

Trend: declining

Avg era reward: 100,807 DOT

Avg assigned stake: 2,421,604 DOT

Avg era point share: 0.17%

Based on 27 eras (chart covers 85)

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

10,001 DOT

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

590.0 DOT

Total income · 2026-07

● Comm 0.0 ● Self 10.8

Rewards distributed: 2,593 DOT

vs last month: ↘ -9.7%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Low

Avg slot: 63.1 (30 days)

90-day avg: 61.0

180-day avg: 62.8

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

⚠️ 2 eras overdue

Overdue (affects health score)

Total unclaimed: 3/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

4/10

Moderate

Health Score: 64.34/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

0/10

No risks detected

✓ No risk flags

⚠️ Unpaid Rewards: 2 eras overdue

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 2233 Details

A+

MVR: 0.62% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

75/100

Moderate

Stable nominators: 775

Unstable nominators: 243

Total nominators: 1027

Stable percentage: 75.5%

Active Set Risk Details

0/10

Low risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 42.7% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #48 → #148 (still safe)

Risk: LOW

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 87.2% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: LOW

Node Telemetry

Meria 02

Parity Polkadot 1.22.3

Peers: 40

Propagation: 419ms

Last snapshot: 2026-07-11 04:32:01

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 4/10 risk = 10 - (64.34/10)

Health Score Breakdown (64.34/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (20 points) 19.15/20

Longevity: 15.0/15 pts
356 days in active set over last 365 days
Slot Volatility: 4.2/5 pts
StdDev 17.0 → 4.2 pts (Low volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 18.44/33

Era Points Consistency: 5.5/15 pts
High era points variance
Turboflakes Grade: 10.0/10 pts
Grade A+ = 10.0 pts
MVR: 5.0/5 pts
0.62% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -2.0 pts penalty
-2.0 pts penalty (2 overdue eras past grace period)

3. Growth (20 points) 5.08/20

APY Relative Score: 0.1/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (27 points) 20.0/27

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: Meria/02
Grade Trend: 3.0/5 pts
Grade stable (3 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 5.0/5 pts
Public telemetry available (5 pts)
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 9.59/20

Nominator Stability: 7.6/10 pts
75.5% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 2.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 100 slots
Aggregate Risk: 0.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 150 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: France
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 7.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
1.22.3-e3737178ec7 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 3.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 85.26/146

Normalized Health Score: 64.34/100

Risk Score: 4/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

MODERATE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

775

75.5%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

243

25%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

775 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

243 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

75.5% Stable 25% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Moderate Risk: Your nominator base has moderate stability. While 775 nominators have been with you long-term, 243 are relatively new (<90 days). Focus on building relationships with your newer nominators to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

0/10

LOW RISK

Current Position

#48

in active set

Safety Buffer

452

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

42.7%

of your stake

→

New Position

#148

▼ 100 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

Still Safe - Would remain well within active set with 452 slot buffer

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 87.2%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 42.7%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income

Meria/02 ✓ Reasonable Fair France, Gravelines

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Health Score Breakdown (64.34/100)

💰 Reward Claims Status

Current Status

Last 30 Eras Timeline

Payment Speed

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

Current Risk Level

How to Improve Nominator Stability

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

Recent Nominator Behavior

How to Reduce Risk