Dionysus🍇/II — Polkadot Validator Performance

Dionysus🍇/II Poor

Backed by 1 nomination pool · browse them

Slot

#691

Commission

Nominators

Stake

176.4K DOT

Updated

1h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Poor)

Active Set Longevity

0 days

0.0% uptime (0 of 1 observed days)

Current streak: 0 days

Longest streak: 0 days

Commission Stability

100/100

Excellent

Change frequency: 0 per 90 days

Volatility: 0.0%

Expected Returns

N/A

Awaiting data collection

Validator Self-Stake

10,040 DOT

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings

N/A

Awaiting data collection

Slot Position Volatility

Low

Avg slot: 691.0 (30 days)

90-day avg: 691.0

180-day avg: 691.0

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

✅ All rewards claimed

Total unclaimed: 0/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

6/10

Moderate

Health Score: 43.95/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

3/10

Low risk

⚠ Threshold risk

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade

N/A

MVR: N/A (non-para)

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus)

Nominator Stability Details

66/100

Moderate

Stable nominators: 4

Unstable nominators: 2

Total nominators: 6

Stable percentage: 66.7%

Active Set Risk Details

10/10

High risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 65.3% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #691 → #891 (would drop out!)

Risk: CRITICAL

Recent Nominator Changes:

✓ 4.2% from recent switchers

Stable nominator base

Risk: CRITICAL

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 6/10 risk = 10 - (43.95/10)

Health Score Breakdown (43.95/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 15.0/30

Longevity: 0.0/15 pts
0 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 10.0/10 pts
No commission changes (10 pts)
Slot Volatility: 5.0/5 pts
StdDev 0.0 → 5.0 pts (Low volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 2.5/33

Era Points Consistency: 0.0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 0.0/10 pts
No Turboflakes grade
MVR: 2.5/5 pts
Non-parachain validator (neutral)
Payout Status: -0.0 pts penalty
No unclaimed eras

3. Growth (20 points) 10.0/20

APY Relative Score: 5.0/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 20.0/32

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: Dionysus🍇/II
Commission Transparency: 5.0/5 pts
No commission changes for 180+ days
Grade Trend: 0.0/5 pts
Grade declined (0 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
No public telemetry
Self-Stake Confidence: 3.0/5 pts
Moderate commitment (5-10% self-stake)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 11.67/20

Nominator Stability: 6.7/10 pts
66.7% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 0.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 200 slots
Aggregate Risk: 5.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 10 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 0.0/8

Location Transparency: 0.0/2 pts
Unknown location
Country Concentration: 0.0/2 pts
Unknown concentration
Provider Concentration: 0.0/2 pts
Unknown concentration

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 2.0/8

Client Version: 0.0/4 pts
Unknown (neutral 2pts)
Location Quality: 2.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 61.17/146

Normalized Health Score: 43.95/100

Risk Score: 6/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

MODERATE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

66.7%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

34%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

4 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

2 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

66.7% Stable 34% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Moderate Risk: Your nominator base has moderate stability. While 4 nominators have been with you long-term, 2 are relatively new (<90 days). Focus on building relationships with your newer nominators to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

10/10

HIGH RISK

Current Position

#691

in active set

Safety Buffer

-291

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

65.3%

of your stake

→

New Position

#891

▼ 200 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

WOULD DROP OUT! - Loss of this nominator would kick you out of the active set

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 4.2%

What This Means:

Stable Base - Very few nominators have recently switched to you, indicating a stable, committed nominator base

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 65.3%)
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income
URGENT: Your buffer is critically low. Focus on attracting new nominators immediately