15AcyK...Biv4bfFv - Polkadot Validator Performance

15AcyK...Biv4bfFv Poor

Netherlands (Kingdom of the), Amsterdam

Slot

#635

Commission

0% · fixed

Nominators

Stake

8.41M DOT

Updated

42m ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Poor)

Active Set Longevity

263 days

71.9% uptime (263 of 366 observed days)

Current streak: 0 days

Longest streak: 206 days

Expected Returns

N/A

Awaiting data collection

Validator Self-Stake

10,001 DOT

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

592.6 DOT

Total income · 2026-07

● Comm 0.0 ● Self 13.4

Rewards distributed: 1,602 DOT

vs last month: ↗ +41.5%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Low

Avg slot: 635.6 (30 days)

90-day avg: 628.1

180-day avg: 573.1

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

✅ All rewards claimed

Total unclaimed: 0/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

6/10

Moderate

Health Score: 41.35/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

3/10

Low risk

⚠ Threshold risk

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 2233 Details

MVR: 1.12% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

73/100

Moderate

Stable nominators: 11

Unstable nominators: 0

Total nominators: 23

Stable percentage: 47.8%

Active Set Risk Details

10/10

High risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 36.8% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #635 → #735 (would drop out!)

Risk: CRITICAL

Recent Nominator Changes:

✓ 0.0% from recent switchers

Stable nominator base

Risk: CRITICAL

Node DHT

scm-ams3-polkadot-validator-71-0

Parity Polkadot v1.22.1

Network: litep2p

IPv6: -

Multi-homed: -

Source: DHT discovery (telemetry not available)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 6/10 risk = 10 - (41.35/10)

Health Score Breakdown (41.35/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (20 points) 15.28/20

Longevity: 10.8/15 pts
263 days in active set over last 365 days
Slot Volatility: 4.5/5 pts
StdDev 10.0 → 4.5 pts (Low volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 12.94/33

Era Points Consistency: 0.0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 8.0/10 pts
Grade A = 8.0 pts
MVR: 4.9/5 pts
1.12% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -0.0 pts penalty
No unclaimed eras

3. Growth (20 points) 10.0/20

APY Relative Score: 5.0/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (27 points) 0.0/27

Identity Completeness: 0.0/12 pts
No on-chain identity
Grade Trend: 0.0/5 pts
Grade declined (0 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
No public telemetry
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 14.39/20

Nominator Stability: 7.4/10 pts
47.8% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 2.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 100 slots
Aggregate Risk: 5.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 10 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 7.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
v1.22.1-f8cfbb96055 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 3.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 65.61/146

Normalized Health Score: 41.35/100

Risk Score: 6/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

MODERATE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

47.8%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

27%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

11 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

0 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

47.8% Stable 27% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Moderate Risk: Your nominator base has moderate stability. While 11 nominators have been with you long-term, 0 are relatively new (<90 days). Focus on building relationships with your newer nominators to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

10/10

HIGH RISK

Current Position

#635

in active set

Safety Buffer

-135

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

36.8%

of your stake

→

New Position

#735

▼ 100 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

WOULD DROP OUT! - Loss of this nominator would kick you out of the active set

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 0.0%

What This Means:

Stable Base - Very few nominators have recently switched to you, indicating a stable, committed nominator base

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 36.8%)
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income
URGENT: Your buffer is critically low. Focus on attracting new nominators immediately

15AcyK...Biv4bfFv Poor Netherlands (Kingdom of the), Amsterdam