Tsuki 🌕/0 - Polkadot Validator Performance

Tsuki 🌕/0 Poor

Slot

#652

Commission

0% · fixed

Nominators

Stake

647.9K DOT

Updated

2h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Poor)

Active Set Longevity

0 days

0.0% uptime (0 of 366 observed days)

Current streak: 0 days

Longest streak: 0 days

Expected Returns

N/A

Awaiting data collection

Validator Self-Stake

10,280 DOT

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings

N/A

Awaiting data collection

Slot Position Volatility

Low

Avg slot: 648.4 (30 days)

90-day avg: 642.3

180-day avg: 642.3

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

✅ All rewards claimed

Total unclaimed: 0/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

7/10

High

Health Score: 30.36/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

3/10

Low risk

⚠ Threshold risk

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade

N/A

MVR: N/A (non-para)

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus)

Nominator Stability Details

28/100

Unstable

Stable nominators: 11

Unstable nominators: 44

Total nominators: 77

Stable percentage: 14.3%

Active Set Risk Details

10/10

High risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 67.9% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #652 → #852 (would drop out!)

Risk: CRITICAL

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 68.4% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: CRITICAL

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 7/10 risk = 10 - (30.36/10)

Health Score Breakdown (30.36/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (20 points) 4.41/20

Longevity: 0.0/15 pts
0 days in active set over last 365 days
Slot Volatility: 4.4/5 pts
StdDev 11.7 → 4.4 pts (Low volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 2.5/33

Era Points Consistency: 0.0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 0.0/10 pts
No Turboflakes grade
MVR: 2.5/5 pts
Non-parachain validator (neutral)
Payout Status: -0.0 pts penalty
No unclaimed eras

3. Growth (20 points) 10.0/20

APY Relative Score: 5.0/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (27 points) 13.0/27

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: Tsuki 🌕/0
Grade Trend: 0.0/5 pts
Grade declined (0 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
No public telemetry
Self-Stake Confidence: 1.0/5 pts
Low commitment (1-5% self-stake)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 2.86/20

Nominator Stability: 2.9/10 pts
14.3% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 0.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 200 slots
Aggregate Risk: 0.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 150 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 0.0/8

Location Transparency: 0.0/2 pts
Unknown location
Country Concentration: 0.0/2 pts
Unknown concentration
Provider Concentration: 0.0/2 pts
Unknown concentration

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 2.0/8

Client Version: 0.0/4 pts
Unknown (neutral 2pts)
Location Quality: 2.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 34.77/146

Normalized Health Score: 30.36/100

Risk Score: 7/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

UNSTABLE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

14.3%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

72%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

11 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

44 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

14.3% Stable 72% Unstable

Current Risk Level

High Risk: Your nominator base is unstable with frequent turnover. Only 14.3% of nominators have been with you for 90+ days. This puts you at risk of sudden stake losses that could drop you from the active set. Immediate action needed to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators
Focus on retention: You have more new nominators than stable ones. Prioritize keeping your current nominators happy

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

10/10

HIGH RISK

Current Position

#652

in active set

Safety Buffer

-252

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

67.9%

of your stake

→

New Position

#852

▼ 200 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

WOULD DROP OUT! - Loss of this nominator would kick you out of the active set

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 68.4%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 67.9%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income
URGENT: Your buffer is critically low. Focus on attracting new nominators immediately