14MTdq...v3D18KJP - Polkadot Validator Performance

14MTdq...v3D18KJP Poor

Canada, Montreal

Slot

#113

Commission

0% · fixed

Nominators

166

Stake

22.00M DOT

Updated

22m ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Poor)

Active Set Longevity

333 days

100.0% uptime (333 of 333 observed days)

Current streak: 333 days

Longest streak: 333 days

Expected Returns Details

2.7% ↗

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 3.0%

Trend: improving

Avg era reward: 69,216 DOT

Avg assigned stake: 1,582,147 DOT

Avg era point share: 0.17%

Based on 27 eras (chart covers 85)

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

30,001 DOT

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

1,115.2 DOT

Total income · 2026-10

● Comm 0.0 ● Self 36.4

Rewards distributed: 1,852 DOT

vs last month: ↘ -54.2%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Low

Avg slot: 43.0 (30 days)

90-day avg: 26.9

180-day avg: 55.3

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

⚠️ 1 era overdue

Overdue (affects health score)

Total unclaimed: 2/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

5/10

Moderate

Health Score: 48.91/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

0/10

No risks detected

✓ No risk flags

⚠️ Unpaid Rewards: 1 era overdue

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 2323 Details

A+

MVR: 0.12% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

81/100

Excellent

Stable nominators: 118

Unstable nominators: 12

Total nominators: 166

Stable percentage: 71.1%

Active Set Risk Details

0/10

Low risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 53.1% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #113 → #313 (still safe)

Risk: LOW

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 78.3% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: LOW

Node DHT

FIGMENT-2 bhs-15

Parity Polkadot v1.22.1

Network: litep2p

IPv6: ✓ Supported

Multi-homed: ✓ Yes

Source: DHT discovery (telemetry not available)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 5/10 risk = 10 - (48.91/10)

Health Score Breakdown (48.91/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (20 points) 18.65/20

Longevity: 15.0/15 pts
333 days in active set over last 365 days
Slot Volatility: 3.6/5 pts
StdDev 26.9 → 3.7 pts (Low volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 12.99/33

Era Points Consistency: 0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 10.0/10 pts
Grade A+ = 10.0 pts
MVR: 5.0/5 pts
0.12% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -2.0 pts penalty
-2.0 pts penalty (1 overdue eras past grace period)

3. Growth (20 points) 9.24/20

APY Relative Score: 4.2/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (27 points) 3.0/27

Identity Completeness: 0.0/12 pts
No on-chain identity
Grade Trend: 3.0/5 pts
Grade stable (3 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
No public telemetry
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 8.19/20

Nominator Stability: 8.2/10 pts
71.1% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 0.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 200 slots
Aggregate Risk: 0.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 150 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Canada
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 7.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
v1.22.1-f8cfbb96055 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 3.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 65.07/146

Normalized Health Score: 48.91/100

Risk Score: 5/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

EXCELLENT

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

118

71.1%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

19%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

118 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

12 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

71.1% Stable 19% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Low Risk: You have an excellent stable nominator base. 71.1% of your nominators have been with you for 90+ days, indicating strong commitment and trust. This stability provides a strong foundation for maintaining your active set position.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

0/10

LOW RISK

Current Position

#113

in active set

Safety Buffer

287

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

53.1%

of your stake

→

New Position

#313

▼ 200 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

Still Safe - Would remain well within active set with 287 slot buffer

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 78.3%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 53.1%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income

14MTdq...v3D18KJP Poor Canada, Montreal

Performance Metrics (Health: Poor)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Health Score Breakdown (48.91/100)

💰 Reward Claims Status

Current Status

Last 30 Eras Timeline

Payment Speed

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

Current Risk Level

How to Improve Nominator Stability

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

Recent Nominator Behavior

How to Reduce Risk