13eQTs...NNqfE51J - Polkadot Validator Performance

13eQTs...NNqfE51J Fair

Canada, Montreal (Google LLC)

Slot

#212

Commission

0% · fixed

Nominators

135

Stake

25.95M DOT

Updated

1h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Active Set Longevity

182 days

63.2% uptime (182 of 288 observed days)

Current streak: 182 days

Longest streak: 182 days

Expected Returns Details

2.5% →

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 2.5%

Trend: stable

Avg era reward: 69,216 DOT

Avg assigned stake: 1,675,695 DOT

Avg era point share: 0.17%

Based on 27 eras (chart covers 85)

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

30,001 DOT

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

70.1 DOT

Total income · 2026-09

● Comm 0.0 ● Self 2.1

Rewards distributed: 115 DOT

vs last month: ↘ -96.9%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Medium

Avg slot: 184.1 (30 days)

90-day avg: 232.7

180-day avg: 317.5

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

✅ All rewards claimed

Total unclaimed: 0/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

4/10

Moderate

Health Score: 60.28/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

0/10

No risks detected

✓ No risk flags

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 2278 Details

A+

MVR: 0.32% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

82/100

Excellent

Stable nominators: 89

Unstable nominators: 1

Total nominators: 135

Stable percentage: 65.9%

Active Set Risk Details

0/10

Low risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 44.9% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #212 → #312 (still safe)

Risk: LOW

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 30.4% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: LOW

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 4/10 risk = 10 - (60.28/10)

Health Score Breakdown (60.28/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (20 points) 11.64/20

Longevity: 9.5/15 pts
182 days in active set over last 365 days
Slot Volatility: 2.2/5 pts
StdDev 56.9 → 2.2 pts (Moderate volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 31.71/33

Era Points Consistency: 16.7/15 pts
Consistent era points performance
Turboflakes Grade: 10.0/10 pts
Grade A+ = 10.0 pts
MVR: 5.0/5 pts
0.32% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -0.0 pts penalty
No unclaimed eras

3. Growth (20 points) 6.37/20

APY Relative Score: 1.4/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (27 points) 3.0/27

Identity Completeness: 0.0/12 pts
No on-chain identity
Grade Trend: 3.0/5 pts
Grade stable (3 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
No public telemetry
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 12.26/20

Nominator Stability: 8.3/10 pts
65.9% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 2.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 100 slots
Aggregate Risk: 2.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 80 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Canada
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 4.0/8

Client Version: 0.0/4 pts
Unknown (neutral 2pts)
Location Quality: 4.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 74.98/146

Normalized Health Score: 60.28/100

Risk Score: 4/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

EXCELLENT

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

65.9%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

18%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

89 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

1 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

65.9% Stable 18% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Low Risk: You have an excellent stable nominator base. 65.9% of your nominators have been with you for 90+ days, indicating strong commitment and trust. This stability provides a strong foundation for maintaining your active set position.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

0/10

LOW RISK

Current Position

#212

in active set

Safety Buffer

288

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

44.9%

of your stake

→

New Position

#312

▼ 100 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

Still Safe - Would remain well within active set with 288 slot buffer

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 30.4%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 44.9%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income

13eQTs...NNqfE51J Fair Canada, Montreal (Google LLC)

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Health Score Breakdown (60.28/100)

💰 Reward Claims Status

Current Status

Last 30 Eras Timeline

Payment Speed

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

Current Risk Level

How to Improve Nominator Stability

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

Recent Nominator Behavior

How to Reduce Risk