13Dnj8...gTT2PEgU - Polkadot Validator Performance

13Dnj8...gTT2PEgU Fair

Australia, Sydney (OVH SAS)

Slot

#155

Commission

0% · fixed

Nominators

Stake

8.55M DOT

Updated

28m ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Active Set Longevity

110 days

100.0% uptime (110 of 110 observed days)

Current streak: 110 days

Longest streak: 110 days

Expected Returns Details

4.8% ↘

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 3.6%

Trend: declining

Avg era reward: 100,807 DOT

Avg assigned stake: 1,225,751 DOT

Avg era point share: 0.17%

Based on 27 eras (chart covers 85)

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

100,000 DOT

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

1,474.3 DOT

Total income · 2026-07

● Comm 0.0 ● Self 212.0

Rewards distributed: 2,563 DOT

vs last month: ↗ +60.3%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Low

Avg slot: 168.7 (30 days)

90-day avg: 184.6

180-day avg: 178.5

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

✅ All rewards claimed

Total unclaimed: 0/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

4/10

Moderate

Health Score: 61.3/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

0/10

No risks detected

✓ No risk flags

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 2233 Details

A+

MVR: 0.77% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

50/100

Moderate

Stable nominators: 1

Unstable nominators: 1

Total nominators: 2

Stable percentage: 50.0%

Active Set Risk Details

0/10

Low risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 98.8% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #155 → #355 (still safe)

Risk: LOW

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 99.2% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: LOW

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 4/10 risk = 10 - (61.3/10)

Health Score Breakdown (61.3/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (20 points) 18.05/20

Longevity: 15.0/15 pts
110 days in active set over last 365 days
Slot Volatility: 3.0/5 pts
StdDev 38.9 → 3.1 pts (Low volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 24.7/33

Era Points Consistency: 9.7/15 pts
High era points variance
Turboflakes Grade: 10.0/10 pts
Grade A+ = 10.0 pts
MVR: 5.0/5 pts
0.77% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -0.0 pts penalty
No unclaimed eras

3. Growth (20 points) 13.56/20

APY Relative Score: 8.6/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (27 points) 6.0/27

Identity Completeness: 0.0/12 pts
No on-chain identity
Grade Trend: 5.0/5 pts
Grade improved (5 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
No public telemetry
Self-Stake Confidence: 1.0/5 pts
Low commitment (1-5% self-stake)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 5.0/20

Nominator Stability: 5.0/10 pts
50.0% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 0.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 200 slots
Aggregate Risk: 0.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 150 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Australia
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 4.0/8

Client Version: 0.0/4 pts
Unknown (neutral 2pts)
Location Quality: 4.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 77.31/146

Normalized Health Score: 61.3/100

Risk Score: 4/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

MODERATE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

50.0%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

50%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

1 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

1 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

50.0% Stable 50% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Moderate Risk: Your nominator base has moderate stability. While 1 nominators have been with you long-term, 1 are relatively new (<90 days). Focus on building relationships with your newer nominators to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

0/10

LOW RISK

Current Position

#155

in active set

Safety Buffer

245

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

98.8%

of your stake

→

New Position

#355

▼ 200 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

Still Safe - Would remain well within active set with 245 slot buffer

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 99.2%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 98.8%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income

13Dnj8...gTT2PEgU Fair Australia, Sydney (OVH SAS)

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Health Score Breakdown (61.3/100)

💰 Reward Claims Status

Current Status

Last 30 Eras Timeline

Payment Speed

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

Current Risk Level

How to Improve Nominator Stability

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

Recent Nominator Behavior

How to Reduce Risk