12vKNm...pGqLpoe2 - Polkadot Validator Performance

12vKNm...pGqLpoe2 Good

France, Strasbourg (velia.net Internetdienste GmbH)

Slot

#590

Commission

0% · fixed

Nominators

Stake

4.30M DOT

Updated

29m ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Good)

Active Set Longevity

104 days

94.5% uptime (104 of 110 observed days)

Current streak: 39 days

Longest streak: 65 days

Expected Returns Details

4.8% ↘

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 3.7%

Trend: declining

Avg era reward: 100,807 DOT

Avg assigned stake: 1,244,544 DOT

Avg era point share: 0.17%

Based on 27 eras (chart covers 79)

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

100,000 DOT

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

1,470.7 DOT

Total income · 2026-07

● Comm 0.0 ● Self 208.3

Rewards distributed: 2,577 DOT

vs last month: ↗ +86.5%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Low

Avg slot: 561.6 (30 days)

90-day avg: 565.8

180-day avg: 562.8

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

✅ All rewards claimed

Total unclaimed: 0/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

3/10

Safe

Health Score: 71.63/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

1/10

Low risk

⚠ Threshold risk

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 2233 Details

A+

MVR: 0.5% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

100/100

Excellent

Stable nominators: 2

Unstable nominators: 0

Total nominators: 2

Stable percentage: 100.0%

Active Set Risk Details

10/10

High risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 97.7% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #590 → #790 (would drop out!)

Risk: CRITICAL

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 30.0% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: CRITICAL

Node DHT

desert-dune

Parity Polkadot v1.22.0

Network: litep2p

IPv6: -

Multi-homed: -

Source: DHT discovery (telemetry not available)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 3/10 risk = 10 - (71.63/10)

Health Score Breakdown (71.63/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (20 points) 18.06/20

Longevity: 14.2/15 pts
104 days in active set over last 365 days
Slot Volatility: 3.9/5 pts
StdDev 22.5 → 3.9 pts (Low volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 29.22/33

Era Points Consistency: 14.2/15 pts
Consistent era points performance
Turboflakes Grade: 10.0/10 pts
Grade A+ = 10.0 pts
MVR: 5.0/5 pts
0.50% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -0.0 pts penalty
No unclaimed eras

3. Growth (20 points) 13.58/20

APY Relative Score: 8.6/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (27 points) 6.0/27

Identity Completeness: 0.0/12 pts
No on-chain identity
Grade Trend: 5.0/5 pts
Grade improved (5 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
No public telemetry
Self-Stake Confidence: 1.0/5 pts
Low commitment (1-5% self-stake)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 12.0/20

Nominator Stability: 10.0/10 pts
100.0% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 0.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 200 slots
Aggregate Risk: 2.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 80 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: France
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 8.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
v1.22.0-2e4dd0bc223 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 4.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 92.86/146

Normalized Health Score: 71.63/100

Risk Score: 3/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

100

EXCELLENT

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

100.0%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

2 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

0 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

100.0% Stable 0% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Low Risk: You have an excellent stable nominator base. 100.0% of your nominators have been with you for 90+ days, indicating strong commitment and trust. This stability provides a strong foundation for maintaining your active set position.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

10/10

HIGH RISK

Current Position

#590

in active set

Safety Buffer

-190

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

97.7%

of your stake

→

New Position

#790

▼ 200 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

WOULD DROP OUT! - Loss of this nominator would kick you out of the active set

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 30.0%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 97.7%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income
URGENT: Your buffer is critically low. Focus on attracting new nominators immediately

12vKNm...pGqLpoe2 Good France, Strasbourg (velia.net Internetdienste GmbH)