P2P.ORG/14 - Polkadot Validator Performance

P2P.ORG/14 ✓ Reasonable Fair

Germany, Frankfurt am Main (Fornex Hosting S.L.)

Part of P2PORG cluster - 16 validators · 2.67% of active set · Manage this fleet →

Backed by 8 nomination pools · browse them

Slot

#598

Commission

0% · fixed

Nominators

820

Stake

4.82M DOT

Updated

1h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Active Set Longevity

290 days

79.2% uptime (290 of 366 observed days)

Current streak: 84 days

Longest streak: 194 days

Expected Returns Details

Not in active set — last active era 2268 (10 eras ago)

2.7% ↗

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Last active-era rate (era 2268): 2.9%

Trend: improving

Avg era reward: 69,216 DOT

Avg assigned stake: 1,581,755 DOT

Avg era point share: 0.17%

Based on 17 eras (chart covers 74)

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

10,001 DOT

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

907.2 DOT

Total income · 2026-08

● Comm 0.0 ● Self 16.0

Rewards distributed: 2,554 DOT

vs last month: ↘ -19.8%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Low

Avg slot: 577.0 (30 days)

90-day avg: 558.4

180-day avg: 580.5

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

✅ All rewards claimed

Total unclaimed: 0/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

5/10

Moderate

Health Score: 50.03/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

2/10

Low risk

⚠ Threshold risk

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 2268 Details

A+

MVR: 0.61% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

52/100

Moderate

Stable nominators: 125

Unstable nominators: 77

Total nominators: 820

Stable percentage: 15.2%

Active Set Risk Details

10/10

High risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 14.5% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #598 → #608 (would drop out!)

Risk: CRITICAL

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 38.1% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: CRITICAL

Node DHT

fornex-polkadot-srv5-validator2

Parity Polkadot v1.21.1

Network: litep2p

IPv6: ✓ Supported

Multi-homed: ✓ Yes

Source: DHT discovery (telemetry not available)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 5/10 risk = 10 - (50.03/10)

Health Score Breakdown (50.03/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (20 points) 14.96/20

Longevity: 11.9/15 pts
290 days in active set over last 365 days
Slot Volatility: 3.1/5 pts
StdDev 38.5 → 3.1 pts (Low volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 14.97/33

Era Points Consistency: 0.0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 10.0/10 pts
Grade A+ = 10.0 pts
MVR: 5.0/5 pts
0.61% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -0.0 pts penalty
No unclaimed eras

3. Growth (20 points) 7.78/20

APY Relative Score: 2.8/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (27 points) 12.0/27

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: P2P.ORG/14
Grade Trend: 0.0/5 pts
Grade declined (0 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
No public telemetry
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 12.29/20

Nominator Stability: 5.3/10 pts
15.2% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 5.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 10 slots
Aggregate Risk: 2.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 80 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Germany
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 8.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
v1.21.1-c6ba84fb493 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 4.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 76.00/146

Normalized Health Score: 50.03/100

Risk Score: 5/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

MODERATE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

125

15.2%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

48%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

125 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

77 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

15.2% Stable 48% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Moderate Risk: Your nominator base has moderate stability. While 125 nominators have been with you long-term, 77 are relatively new (<90 days). Focus on building relationships with your newer nominators to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

10/10

HIGH RISK

Current Position

#598

in active set

Safety Buffer

-8

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

14.5%

of your stake

→

New Position

#608

▼ 10 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

WOULD DROP OUT! - Loss of this nominator would kick you out of the active set

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 38.1%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income
URGENT: Your buffer is critically low. Focus on attracting new nominators immediately

P2P.ORG/14 ✓ Reasonable Fair Germany, Frankfurt am Main (Fornex Hosting S.L.)