12DvzV...7NjqfrLc - Polkadot Validator Performance

12DvzV...7NjqfrLc Poor

Sweden, Stockholm (Amazon.com, Inc.)

Slot

#432

Commission

0% · fixed

Nominators

Stake

10.98M DOT

Updated

2h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Poor)

Active Set Longevity

337 days

92.1% uptime (337 of 366 observed days)

Current streak: 10 days

Longest streak: 316 days

Expected Returns Details

0.7% →

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 1.6%

Trend: stable

Avg era reward: 69,216 DOT

Avg assigned stake: 1,380,502 DOT

Avg era point share: 0.04%

Based on 7 eras (chart covers 45)

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

10,101 DOT

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

22.5 DOT

Total income · 2026-10

● Comm 0.0 ● Self 0.5

Rewards distributed: 65 DOT

vs last month: ↘ -93.8%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Medium

Avg slot: 594.2 (30 days)

90-day avg: 548.3

180-day avg: 491.8

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

✅ All rewards claimed

Total unclaimed: 0/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

5/10

Moderate

Health Score: 45.61/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

2/10

Low risk

⚠ Low era points

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 2323 Details

MVR: 47.7% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

70/100

Moderate

Stable nominators: 29

Unstable nominators: 0

Total nominators: 70

Stable percentage: 41.4%

Active Set Risk Details

3/10

Low risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 28.7% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #432 → #482 (moderate buffer)

Risk: MODERATE

Recent Nominator Changes:

✓ 4.0% from recent switchers

Stable nominator base

Risk: LOW

Node Telemetry

CryptologyPolka-25

Parity Polkadot 1.19.0

Peers: 19

Propagation: 290ms

Last snapshot: 2026-10-11 04:32:01

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 5/10 risk = 10 - (45.61/10)

Health Score Breakdown (45.61/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (20 points) 14.07/20

Longevity: 13.8/15 pts
337 days in active set over last 365 days
Slot Volatility: 0.3/5 pts
StdDev 94.9 → 0.3 pts (Moderate volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 6.61/33

Era Points Consistency: 0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 4.0/10 pts
Grade C = 4.0 pts
MVR: 2.6/5 pts
47.70% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -0.0 pts penalty
No unclaimed eras

3. Growth (20 points) 5.08/20

APY Relative Score: 0.1/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (27 points) 10.0/27

Identity Completeness: 0.0/12 pts
No on-chain identity
Grade Trend: 5.0/5 pts
Grade improved (5 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 5.0/5 pts
Public telemetry available (5 pts)
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 16.07/20

Nominator Stability: 7.1/10 pts
41.4% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 4.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 50 slots
Aggregate Risk: 5.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 10 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Sweden
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 3.5/8

Client Version: 0.0/4 pts
1.19.0-6fd693e6d9c = 2+ versions behind (0pts)
Location Quality: 3.5/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 61.33/146

Normalized Health Score: 45.61/100

Risk Score: 5/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

MODERATE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

41.4%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

30%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

29 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

0 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

41.4% Stable 30% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Moderate Risk: Your nominator base has moderate stability. While 29 nominators have been with you long-term, 0 are relatively new (<90 days). Focus on building relationships with your newer nominators to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

3/10

LOW RISK

Current Position

#432

in active set

Safety Buffer

118

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

28.7%

of your stake

→

New Position

#482

▼ 50 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

Moderate Buffer - Would remain in active set but closer to the edge (118 slot buffer)

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 4.0%

What This Means:

Stable Base - Very few nominators have recently switched to you, indicating a stable, committed nominator base

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 28.7%)
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income

12DvzV...7NjqfrLc Poor Sweden, Stockholm (Amazon.com, Inc.)