121MoE...28G3Tb7D - Polkadot Validator Performance

121MoE...28G3Tb7D Fair

Sweden, Stockholm (Amazon.com, Inc.)

Slot

#123

Commission

0% · fixed

Nominators

Stake

11.10M DOT

Updated

42m ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Active Set Longevity

265 days

72.4% uptime (265 of 366 observed days)

Current streak: 110 days

Longest streak: 142 days

Expected Returns Details

3.1% →

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 3.2%

Trend: stable

Avg era reward: 69,218 DOT

Avg assigned stake: 1,399,879 DOT

Avg era point share: 0.17%

Based on 27 eras (chart covers 85)

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

10,100 DOT

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

641.9 DOT

Total income · 2026-10

● Comm 0.0 ● Self 13.4

Rewards distributed: 1,860 DOT

vs last month: ↘ -54.0%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

High

Avg slot: 379.1 (30 days)

90-day avg: 434.4

180-day avg: 521.9

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

✅ All rewards claimed

Total unclaimed: 0/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

4/10

Moderate

Health Score: 64.31/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

0/10

No risks detected

✓ No risk flags

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 2324 Details

A+

MVR: 0.05% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

63/100

Moderate

Stable nominators: 23

Unstable nominators: 3

Total nominators: 72

Stable percentage: 31.9%

Active Set Risk Details

0/10

Low risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 28.4% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #123 → #173 (still safe)

Risk: LOW

Recent Nominator Changes:

✓ 4.4% from recent switchers

Stable nominator base

Risk: LOW

Node Telemetry

CryptologyPolka-29

Parity Polkadot 1.19.0

Peers: 24

Propagation: 285ms

Last snapshot: 2026-10-11 04:32:01

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 4/10 risk = 10 - (64.31/10)

Health Score Breakdown (64.31/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (20 points) 10.86/20

Longevity: 10.9/15 pts
265 days in active set over last 365 days
Slot Volatility: 0/5 pts
StdDev 100.4 → 0.0 pts (High volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 27.76/33

Era Points Consistency: 12.8/15 pts
Moderate era points variance
Turboflakes Grade: 10.0/10 pts
Grade A+ = 10.0 pts
MVR: 5.0/5 pts
0.05% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -0.0 pts penalty
No unclaimed eras

3. Growth (20 points) 12.25/20

APY Relative Score: 7.2/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (27 points) 8.0/27

Identity Completeness: 0.0/12 pts
No on-chain identity
Grade Trend: 3.0/5 pts
Grade stable (3 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 5.0/5 pts
Public telemetry available (5 pts)
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 15.39/20

Nominator Stability: 6.4/10 pts
31.9% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 4.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 50 slots
Aggregate Risk: 5.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 10 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Sweden
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 3.5/8

Client Version: 0.0/4 pts
1.19.0-6fd693e6d9c = 2+ versions behind (0pts)
Location Quality: 3.5/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 83.76/146

Normalized Health Score: 64.31/100

Risk Score: 4/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

MODERATE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

31.9%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

37%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

23 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

3 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

31.9% Stable 37% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Moderate Risk: Your nominator base has moderate stability. While 23 nominators have been with you long-term, 3 are relatively new (<90 days). Focus on building relationships with your newer nominators to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

0/10

LOW RISK

Current Position

#123

in active set

Safety Buffer

427

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

28.4%

of your stake

→

New Position

#173

▼ 50 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

Still Safe - Would remain well within active set with 427 slot buffer

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 4.4%

What This Means:

Stable Base - Very few nominators have recently switched to you, indicating a stable, committed nominator base

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 28.4%)
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income

121MoE...28G3Tb7D Fair Sweden, Stockholm (Amazon.com, Inc.)

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Health Score Breakdown (64.31/100)

💰 Reward Claims Status

Current Status

Last 30 Eras Timeline

Payment Speed

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

Current Risk Level

How to Improve Nominator Stability

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

Recent Nominator Behavior

How to Reduce Risk