DOTSAMA/3 - Kusama Validator Performance

DOTSAMA/3 ✓ Reasonable Fair

Finland, Helsinki (Hetzner Online GmbH)

Part of DOTSAMA cluster - 4 validators · 0.57% of active set · Manage this fleet →

Slot

#640

Commission

29%

Nominators

Stake

19.4K KSM

Updated

4h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Active Set Longevity

103 days

30.9% uptime (103 of 333 observed days)

Current streak: 52 days

Longest streak: 52 days

Commission Stability

90/100

Excellent

Change frequency: 0 per 90 days

Volatility: 4.9%

Last changed: 2026-03-19 22:10:15

Expected Returns Details

11.2% ↗

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 15.5%

Trend: improving

Avg era reward: 922 KSM

Avg assigned stake: 13,667 KSM

Avg era point share: 0.15%

Based on 83 eras

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

0 KSM

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

25.3 KSM

Total income · 2026-10

● Comm 25.3 ● Self 0.0

Rewards distributed: 87 KSM

vs last month: ↗ +205.6%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Low

Avg slot: 637.5 (30 days)

90-day avg: 651.8

180-day avg: 763.1

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

✅ All rewards claimed

Total unclaimed: 0/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

4/10

Moderate

Health Score: 64.38/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

0/10

No risks detected

✓ No risk flags

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 10156 Details

A+

MVR: 0.0% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

71/100

Moderate

Stable nominators: 9

Unstable nominators: 2

Total nominators: 16

Stable percentage: 56.2%

Active Set Risk Details

10/10

High risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 49.0% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #640 → #740 (would drop out!)

Risk: CRITICAL

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 25.1% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: HIGH

Node Telemetry

8KQ43

Parity Polkadot 1.24.3

Peers: 39

Propagation: 319ms

Last snapshot: 2026-10-11 04:34:02

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 4/10 risk = 10 - (64.38/10)

Health Score Breakdown (64.38/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 16.95/30

Longevity: 4.6/15 pts
103 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 9.0/10 pts
No commission changes (10 pts)
Slot Volatility: 3.3/5 pts
StdDev 33.7 → 3.3 pts (Low volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 15.0/33

Era Points Consistency: 0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 10.0/10 pts
Grade A+ = 10.0 pts
MVR: 5.0/5 pts
0.00% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -0.0 pts penalty
No unclaimed eras

3. Growth (20 points) 7.86/20

APY Relative Score: 2.9/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 25.0/32

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: DOTSAMA/3
Commission Transparency: 5.0/5 pts
No commission changes for 180+ days
Grade Trend: 3.0/5 pts
Grade stable (3 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 5.0/5 pts
Public telemetry available (5 pts)
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 13.19/20

Nominator Stability: 7.2/10 pts
56.2% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 2.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 100 slots
Aggregate Risk: 4.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 40 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Finland
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 8.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
1.24.3-9d0dc6e8fbb = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 4.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 92.00/146

Normalized Health Score: 64.38/100

Risk Score: 4/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

MODERATE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

56.2%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

29%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

9 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

2 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

56.2% Stable 29% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Moderate Risk: Your nominator base has moderate stability. While 9 nominators have been with you long-term, 2 are relatively new (<90 days). Focus on building relationships with your newer nominators to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

10/10

HIGH RISK

Current Position

#640

in active set

Safety Buffer

-40

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

49.0%

of your stake

→

New Position

#740

▼ 100 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

WOULD DROP OUT! - Loss of this nominator would kick you out of the active set

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 25.1%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 49.0%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income
URGENT: Your buffer is critically low. Focus on attracting new nominators immediately

DOTSAMA/3 ✓ Reasonable Fair Finland, Helsinki (Hetzner Online GmbH)