P2P.ORG/74 - Kusama Validator Performance

P2P.ORG/74 ✓ Reasonable Poor

Netherlands (Kingdom of the), Amsterdam

Part of P2PORG cluster - 17 validators · 2.43% of active set · Manage this fleet →

Backed by 3 nomination pools · browse them

Slot

#641

Commission

30%

Nominators

120

Stake

29.6K KSM

Updated

7h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Poor)

Active Set Longevity

214 days

60.5% uptime (214 of 354 observed days)

Current streak: 1 days

Longest streak: 157 days

Commission Stability

76/100

Moderate

Change frequency: 0 per 90 days

Volatility: 5.8%

Last changed: 2026-04-02 22:10:06

Expected Returns Details

10.3% →

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 14.1%

Trend: stable

Avg era reward: 896 KSM

Avg assigned stake: 12,663 KSM

Avg era point share: 0.13%

Based on 45 eras

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

5 KSM

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

14.6 KSM

Total income · 2026-07

● Comm 14.6 ● Self 0.0

Rewards distributed: 49 KSM

vs last month: ↗ +827.8%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

High

Avg slot: 686.8 (30 days)

90-day avg: 711.4

180-day avg: 752.7

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

⚠️ 1 era overdue

Overdue (affects health score)

Total unclaimed: 1/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

5/10

Moderate

Health Score: 48.62/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

2/10

Low risk

⚠ Low era points

⚠️ Unpaid Rewards: 1 era overdue

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 9794 Details

MVR: 9.4% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

55/100

Moderate

Stable nominators: 60

Unstable nominators: 47

Total nominators: 120

Stable percentage: 50.0%

Active Set Risk Details

10/10

High risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 24.6% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #641 → #691 (close to edge)

Risk: HIGH

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 32.3% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: CRITICAL

Node DHT

scm-fra1-kusama-validator-45-0

Parity Polkadot v1.22.1

Network: litep2p

IPv6: -

Multi-homed: -

Source: DHT discovery (telemetry not available)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 5/10 risk = 10 - (48.62/10)

Health Score Breakdown (48.62/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 16.67/30

Longevity: 9.1/15 pts
214 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 7.6/10 pts
No commission changes (10 pts)
Slot Volatility: 0/5 pts
StdDev 240.1 → 0.0 pts (High volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 8.53/33

Era Points Consistency: 0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 6.0/10 pts
Grade B = 6.0 pts
MVR: 4.5/5 pts
9.40% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -2.0 pts penalty
-2.0 pts penalty (1 overdue eras past grace period)

3. Growth (20 points) 7.27/20

APY Relative Score: 2.3/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 15.0/32

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: P2P.ORG/74
Commission Transparency: 0.0/5 pts
No commission changes for 180+ days
Grade Trend: 3.0/5 pts
Grade stable (3 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
No public telemetry
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 11.54/20

Nominator Stability: 5.5/10 pts
50.0% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 4.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 50 slots
Aggregate Risk: 2.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 80 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 7.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
v1.22.1-f8cfbb96055 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 3.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 72.01/146

Normalized Health Score: 48.62/100

Risk Score: 5/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

MODERATE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

50.0%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

45%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

60 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

47 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

50.0% Stable 45% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Moderate Risk: Your nominator base has moderate stability. While 60 nominators have been with you long-term, 47 are relatively new (<90 days). Focus on building relationships with your newer nominators to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

10/10

HIGH RISK

Current Position

#641

in active set

Safety Buffer

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

24.6%

of your stake

→

New Position

#691

▼ 50 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

Close to Edge - Only 9 slots from dropping out - very risky!

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 32.3%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 24.6%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income
URGENT: Your buffer is critically low. Focus on attracting new nominators immediately

P2P.ORG/74 ✓ Reasonable Poor Netherlands (Kingdom of the), Amsterdam

Performance Metrics (Health: Poor)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Health Score Breakdown (48.62/100)

💰 Reward Claims Status

Current Status

Last 30 Eras Timeline

Payment Speed

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

Current Risk Level

How to Improve Nominator Stability

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

Recent Nominator Behavior

How to Reduce Risk