DOTSAMA/5 - Kusama Validator Performance

DOTSAMA/5 ✓ Reasonable Fair

Germany, Falkenstein (Hetzner Online GmbH)

Part of DOTSAMA cluster - 4 validators · 0.57% of active set · Manage this fleet →

Backed by 1 nomination pool · browse them

Slot

#615

Commission

24%

Nominators

Stake

32.6K KSM

Updated

2h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Active Set Longevity

74 days

20.2% uptime (74 of 366 observed days)

Current streak: 67 days

Longest streak: 67 days

Commission Stability

91/100

Excellent

Change frequency: 0 per 90 days

Volatility: 3.3%

Last changed: 2026-03-19 22:10:15

Expected Returns Details

12.3% ↗

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 14.2%

Trend: improving

Avg era reward: 919 KSM

Avg assigned stake: 13,756 KSM

Avg era point share: 0.16%

Based on 85 eras

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

0 KSM

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

0.9 KSM

Total income · 2026-09

● Comm 0.9 ● Self 0.0

Rewards distributed: 4 KSM

vs last month: ↘ -96.7%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

High

Avg slot: 583.6 (30 days)

90-day avg: 648.5

180-day avg: 773.9

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

✅ All rewards claimed

Total unclaimed: 0/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

5/10

Moderate

Health Score: 52.91/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

0/10

No risks detected

✓ No risk flags

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 9976 Details

A+

MVR: 0.11% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

55/100

Moderate

Stable nominators: 6

Unstable nominators: 4

Total nominators: 18

Stable percentage: 33.3%

Active Set Risk Details

10/10

High risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 77.9% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #615 → #815 (would drop out!)

Risk: CRITICAL

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 79.3% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: CRITICAL

Node Telemetry

QVE236

Parity Polkadot 1.24.1

Peers: 38

Propagation: 316ms

Last snapshot: 2026-09-01 04:34:02

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 5/10 risk = 10 - (52.91/10)

Health Score Breakdown (52.91/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 12.13/30

Longevity: 3.0/15 pts
74 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 9.1/10 pts
No commission changes (10 pts)
Slot Volatility: 0/5 pts
StdDev 129.4 → 0.0 pts (High volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 14.99/33

Era Points Consistency: 0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 10.0/10 pts
Grade A+ = 10.0 pts
MVR: 5.0/5 pts
0.11% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -0.0 pts penalty
No unclaimed eras

3. Growth (20 points) 8.57/20

APY Relative Score: 3.6/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 20.0/32

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: DOTSAMA/5
Commission Transparency: 0.0/5 pts
No commission changes for 180+ days
Grade Trend: 3.0/5 pts
Grade stable (3 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 5.0/5 pts
Public telemetry available (5 pts)
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 5.56/20

Nominator Stability: 5.6/10 pts
33.3% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 0.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 200 slots
Aggregate Risk: 0.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 150 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Germany
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 8.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
1.24.1-8ae9775dc43 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 4.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 75.25/146

Normalized Health Score: 52.91/100

Risk Score: 5/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

MODERATE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

33.3%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

45%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

6 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

4 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

33.3% Stable 45% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Moderate Risk: Your nominator base has moderate stability. While 6 nominators have been with you long-term, 4 are relatively new (<90 days). Focus on building relationships with your newer nominators to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

10/10

HIGH RISK

Current Position

#615

in active set

Safety Buffer

-115

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

77.9%

of your stake

→

New Position

#815

▼ 200 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

WOULD DROP OUT! - Loss of this nominator would kick you out of the active set

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 79.3%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 77.9%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income
URGENT: Your buffer is critically low. Focus on attracting new nominators immediately

DOTSAMA/5 ✓ Reasonable Fair Germany, Falkenstein (Hetzner Online GmbH)