ULTRAOPS/PASCAL - Kusama Validator Performance

ULTRAOPS/PASCAL ✓ Reasonable Fair

Germany, Nuremberg (netcup GmbH)

Part of the ULTRAOPS fleet · 3 validators · See the fleet →

Slot

#22

Commission

15%

Nominators

Stake

381.9K KSM

Updated

8h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Active Set Longevity

364 days

99.7% uptime (364 of 365 observed days)

Current streak: 357 days

Longest streak: 357 days

Commission Stability

100/100

Excellent

Change frequency: 0 per 90 days

Volatility: 0.0%

Expected Returns Details

7.8% ↘

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 5.9%

Trend: declining

Avg era reward: 895 KSM

Avg assigned stake: 21,937 KSM

Avg era point share: 0.15%

Based on 85 eras

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

0 KSM

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

13.4 KSM

Total income · 2026-07

● Comm 13.4 ● Self 0.0

Rewards distributed: 90 KSM

vs last month: ↗ +308.6%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Low

Avg slot: 49.2 (30 days)

90-day avg: 38.7

180-day avg: 44.3

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

✅ All rewards claimed

Total unclaimed: 0/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

3/10

Safe

Health Score: 67.4/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

0/10

No risks detected

✓ No risk flags

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 9794 Details

A+

MVR: 0.3% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

51/100

Moderate

Stable nominators: 19

Unstable nominators: 18

Total nominators: 47

Stable percentage: 40.4%

Active Set Risk Details

0/10

Low risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 38.8% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #22 → #122 (still safe)

Risk: LOW

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 96.1% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: LOW

Node Telemetry

ULTRAOPS Ⲽ PASCAL NEW

Parity Polkadot 1.22.0

Peers: 8

Propagation: 309ms

Last snapshot: 2026-07-11 04:34:02

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 3/10 risk = 10 - (67.4/10)

Health Score Breakdown (67.4/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 28.78/30

Longevity: 15.0/15 pts
364 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 10.0/10 pts
No commission changes (10 pts)
Slot Volatility: 3.8/5 pts
StdDev 23.7 → 3.8 pts (Low volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 14.99/33

Era Points Consistency: 0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 10.0/10 pts
Grade A+ = 10.0 pts
MVR: 5.0/5 pts
0.30% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -0.0 pts penalty
No unclaimed eras

3. Growth (20 points) 6.58/20

APY Relative Score: 1.6/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 25.0/32

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: ULTRAOPS/PASCAL
Commission Transparency: 5.0/5 pts
No commission changes for 180+ days
Grade Trend: 3.0/5 pts
Grade stable (3 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 5.0/5 pts
Public telemetry available (5 pts)
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 7.11/20

Nominator Stability: 5.1/10 pts
40.4% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 2.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 100 slots
Aggregate Risk: 0.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 150 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Germany
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 8.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
1.22.0-2e4dd0bc223 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 4.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 96.46/146

Normalized Health Score: 67.4/100

Risk Score: 3/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

MODERATE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

40.4%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

49%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

19 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

18 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

40.4% Stable 49% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Moderate Risk: Your nominator base has moderate stability. While 19 nominators have been with you long-term, 18 are relatively new (<90 days). Focus on building relationships with your newer nominators to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

0/10

LOW RISK

Current Position

#22

in active set

Safety Buffer

578

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

38.8%

of your stake

→

New Position

#122

▼ 100 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

Still Safe - Would remain well within active set with 578 slot buffer

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 96.1%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 38.8%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income

ULTRAOPS/PASCAL ✓ Reasonable Fair Germany, Nuremberg (netcup GmbH)

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Health Score Breakdown (67.4/100)

💰 Reward Claims Status

Current Status

Last 30 Eras Timeline

Payment Speed

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

Current Risk Level

How to Improve Nominator Stability

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

Recent Nominator Behavior

How to Reduce Risk