HA8Yhz...S1tVffBZ - Kusama Validator Performance

HA8Yhz...S1tVffBZ Fair

United Kingdom, London (OVH SAS)

Slot

#929

Commission

100%

Nominators

Stake

64.4K KSM

Updated

79d ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Active Set Longevity

0 days

0.0% uptime (0 of 287 observed days)

Current streak: 0 days

Longest streak: 0 days

Commission Stability

100/100

Excellent

Change frequency: 0 per 90 days

Volatility: 0.0%

Expected Returns Details

Not in active set — last active era 9476 (318 eras ago)

0.0% →

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Last active-era rate (era 9476): 0.0%

Trend: stable

Avg era reward: 897 KSM

Avg assigned stake: 6,442 KSM

Avg era point share: 0.11%

Based on 78 eras

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

0 KSM

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

0.0 KSM

Total income · 2026-04

● Comm 0.0 ● Self 0.0

Rewards distributed: 2 KSM

vs last month: -

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Low

Avg slot: 0.0 (30 days)

90-day avg: 930.4

180-day avg: 977.2

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

✅ All rewards claimed

Total unclaimed: 0/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

4/10

Moderate

Health Score: 55.66/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

7/10

High risk

⚠ 100% commission

⚠ Threshold risk

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 9479 Details

A+

MVR: 0.27% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

0/100

Unstable

Stable nominators: 0

Unstable nominators: 0

Total nominators: 0

Stable percentage: 0.0%

Active Set Risk Details

10/10

High risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 0.0% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #929 → #929 (would drop out!)

Risk: CRITICAL

Recent Nominator Changes:

✓ 0.0% from recent switchers

Stable nominator base

Risk: CRITICAL

Node Telemetry

kiln-validator-c-s4-b

Parity Polkadot 1.19.2

Peers: 40

Propagation: 212ms

Last snapshot: 2026-04-11 04:34:07

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 4/10 risk = 10 - (55.66/10)

Health Score Breakdown (55.66/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 24.35/30

Longevity: 11.4/15 pts
0 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 10.0/10 pts
No commission changes (10 pts)
Slot Volatility: 2.9/5 pts
StdDev 1.7 → 4.9 pts (Low volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 14.99/33

Era Points Consistency: 0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 10.0/10 pts
Grade A+ = 10.0 pts
MVR: 5.0/5 pts
0.27% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -0.0 pts penalty
No unclaimed eras

3. Growth (20 points) 5.0/20

APY Relative Score: 0.0/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 8.0/32

Identity Completeness: 0.0/12 pts
No on-chain identity
Commission Transparency: 5.0/5 pts
No commission changes for 180+ days
Grade Trend: 3.0/5 pts
Grade stable (3 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
Public telemetry available (5 pts)
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 16.91/20

Nominator Stability: 9.9/10 pts
0.0% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 2.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 0 slots
Aggregate Risk: 5.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 0 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: United Kingdom
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 4.0/8

Client Version: 0.0/4 pts
1.19.2-2caeef482a4 = 2+ versions behind (0pts)
Location Quality: 4.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 79.25/146

Normalized Health Score: 55.66/100

Risk Score: 4/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

UNSTABLE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

0.0%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

100%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

0 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

0 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

0.0% Stable 100% Unstable

Current Risk Level

High Risk: Your nominator base is unstable with frequent turnover. Only 0.0% of nominators have been with you for 90+ days. This puts you at risk of sudden stake losses that could drop you from the active set. Immediate action needed to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

10/10

HIGH RISK

Current Position

#929

in active set

Safety Buffer

-229

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

0.0%

of your stake

→

New Position

#929

No change

Impact Assessment:

WOULD DROP OUT! - Loss of this nominator would kick you out of the active set

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 0.0%

What This Means:

Stable Base - Very few nominators have recently switched to you, indicating a stable, committed nominator base

How to Reduce Risk

Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income
URGENT: Your buffer is critically low. Focus on attracting new nominators immediately

HA8Yhz...S1tVffBZ Fair United Kingdom, London (OVH SAS)

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Health Score Breakdown (55.66/100)

💰 Reward Claims Status

Current Status

Last 30 Eras Timeline

Payment Speed

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

Current Risk Level

How to Improve Nominator Stability

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

Recent Nominator Behavior

How to Reduce Risk