P2P.ORG/113 - Kusama Validator Performance

P2P.ORG/113 ✓ Reasonable Poor

Germany, Frankfurt am Main (Fornex Hosting S.L.)

Part of P2PORG cluster - 17 validators · 2.43% of active set · Manage this fleet →

Backed by 5 nomination pools · browse them

Slot

#851

Commission

30%

Nominators

Stake

20.8K KSM

Updated

8h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Poor)

Active Set Longevity

222 days

60.8% uptime (222 of 365 observed days)

Current streak: 0 days

Longest streak: 210 days

Commission Stability

76/100

Moderate

Change frequency: 0 per 90 days

Volatility: 5.8%

Last changed: 2026-04-02 22:10:06

Expected Returns Details

Not in active set — last active era 9713 (81 eras ago)

7.7% →

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Last active-era rate (era 9713): 5.2%

Trend: stable

Avg era reward: 901 KSM

Avg assigned stake: 7,831 KSM

Avg era point share: 0.06%

Based on 4 eras

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

2 KSM

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

0.7 KSM

Total income · 2026-06

● Comm 0.7 ● Self 0.0

Rewards distributed: 2 KSM

vs last month: ↗ +48.9%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

High

Avg slot: 905.0 (30 days)

90-day avg: 893.7

180-day avg: 897.9

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

✅ All rewards claimed

Total unclaimed: 0/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

6/10

Moderate

Health Score: 44.71/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

3/10

Low risk

⚠ Threshold risk

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 9713 Details

A+

MVR: 0.0% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

65/100

Moderate

Stable nominators: 49

Unstable nominators: 25

Total nominators: 80

Stable percentage: 61.2%

Active Set Risk Details

10/10

High risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 35.1% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #851 → #951 (would drop out!)

Risk: CRITICAL

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 13.7% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: CRITICAL

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 6/10 risk = 10 - (44.71/10)

Health Score Breakdown (44.71/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 16.72/30

Longevity: 9.1/15 pts
222 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 7.6/10 pts
No commission changes (10 pts)
Slot Volatility: 0/5 pts
StdDev 238.0 → 0.0 pts (High volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 15.0/33

Era Points Consistency: 0.0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 10.0/10 pts
Grade A+ = 10.0 pts
MVR: 5.0/5 pts
0.00% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -0.0 pts penalty
No unclaimed eras

3. Growth (20 points) 6.55/20

APY Relative Score: 1.6/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 12.0/32

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: P2P.ORG/113
Commission Transparency: 0.0/5 pts
No commission changes for 180+ days
Grade Trend: 0.0/5 pts
Grade declined (0 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
No public telemetry
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 13.5/20

Nominator Stability: 6.5/10 pts
61.2% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 2.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 100 slots
Aggregate Risk: 5.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 10 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Germany
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 4.0/8

Client Version: 0.0/4 pts
Unknown (neutral 2pts)
Location Quality: 4.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 73.77/146

Normalized Health Score: 44.71/100

Risk Score: 6/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

MODERATE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

61.2%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

35%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

49 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

25 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

61.2% Stable 35% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Moderate Risk: Your nominator base has moderate stability. While 49 nominators have been with you long-term, 25 are relatively new (<90 days). Focus on building relationships with your newer nominators to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

10/10

HIGH RISK

Current Position

#851

in active set

Safety Buffer

-251

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

35.1%

of your stake

→

New Position

#951

▼ 100 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

WOULD DROP OUT! - Loss of this nominator would kick you out of the active set

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 13.7%

What This Means:

Some Turnover - Moderate amount of recent switchers. These nominators may be less committed and could leave for other validators

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 35.1%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income
URGENT: Your buffer is critically low. Focus on attracting new nominators immediately

P2P.ORG/113 ✓ Reasonable Poor Germany, Frankfurt am Main (Fornex Hosting S.L.)

Performance Metrics (Health: Poor)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Health Score Breakdown (44.71/100)

💰 Reward Claims Status

Current Status

Last 30 Eras Timeline

Payment Speed

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

Current Risk Level

How to Improve Nominator Stability

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

Recent Nominator Behavior

How to Reduce Risk