ParaNodes.io/13🚀 - Kusama Validator Performance

ParaNodes.io/13🚀 ✓ Verified Poor

United States of America, Dover

Part of PARANODESIO cluster - 8 validators · 1.14% of active set · Manage this fleet →

Backed by 4 nomination pools · browse them

Slot

#821

Commission

50%

Nominators

Stake

32.8K KSM

Updated

11h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Poor)

Active Set Longevity

62 days

17.0% uptime (62 of 365 observed days)

Current streak: 0 days

Longest streak: 56 days

Commission Stability

50/100

Moderate

Change frequency: 1 per 90 days

Volatility: 12.3%

Last changed: 2026-07-04 22:10:34

Expected Returns

N/A

Awaiting data collection

Validator Self-Stake

10 KSM

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

0.3 KSM

Total income · 2026-06

● Comm 0.3 ● Self 0.0

Rewards distributed: 1 KSM

vs last month: ↘ -33.1%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

High

Avg slot: 789.1 (30 days)

90-day avg: 835.2

180-day avg: 913.0

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

⚠️ 1 era overdue

Overdue (affects health score)

Total unclaimed: 1/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

6/10

Moderate

Health Score: 41.21/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

3/10

Low risk

⚠ Threshold risk

⚠️ Unpaid Rewards: 1 era overdue

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 9713 Details

A+

MVR: 1.26% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

61/100

Moderate

Stable nominators: 25

Unstable nominators: 7

Total nominators: 80

Stable percentage: 31.2%

Active Set Risk Details

10/10

High risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 42.6% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #821 → #921 (would drop out!)

Risk: CRITICAL

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 14.3% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: CRITICAL

Node Telemetry

Dox-KSM-13

Parity Polkadot 1.24.1

Peers: 40

Propagation: 147ms

Last snapshot: 2026-09-01 04:34:02

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 6/10 risk = 10 - (41.21/10)

Health Score Breakdown (41.21/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 7.55/30

Longevity: 2.5/15 pts
62 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 5.0/10 pts
1 commission changes over 180 days
Slot Volatility: 0/5 pts
StdDev 149.3 → 0.0 pts (High volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 12.94/33

Era Points Consistency: 0.0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 10.0/10 pts
Grade A+ = 10.0 pts
MVR: 4.9/5 pts
1.26% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -2.0 pts penalty
-2.0 pts penalty (1 overdue eras past grace period)

3. Growth (20 points) 10.0/20

APY Relative Score: 5.0/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 17.0/32

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: ParaNodes.io/13🚀
Commission Transparency: 0.0/5 pts
1 commission changes in 180 days (0 pts)
Grade Trend: 0.0/5 pts
Grade declined (0 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 5.0/5 pts
Public telemetry available (5 pts)
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 13.12/20

Nominator Stability: 6.1/10 pts
31.2% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 2.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 100 slots
Aggregate Risk: 5.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 10 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: United States of America
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 7.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
1.24.1-8ae9775dc43 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 3.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 73.61/146

Normalized Health Score: 41.21/100

Risk Score: 6/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

MODERATE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

31.2%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

39%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

25 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

7 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

31.2% Stable 39% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Moderate Risk: Your nominator base has moderate stability. While 25 nominators have been with you long-term, 7 are relatively new (<90 days). Focus on building relationships with your newer nominators to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

10/10

HIGH RISK

Current Position

#821

in active set

Safety Buffer

-221

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

42.6%

of your stake

→

New Position

#921

▼ 100 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

WOULD DROP OUT! - Loss of this nominator would kick you out of the active set

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 14.3%

What This Means:

Some Turnover - Moderate amount of recent switchers. These nominators may be less committed and could leave for other validators

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 42.6%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income
URGENT: Your buffer is critically low. Focus on attracting new nominators immediately

ParaNodes.io/13🚀 ✓ Verified Poor United States of America, Dover

Performance Metrics (Health: Poor)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Health Score Breakdown (41.21/100)

💰 Reward Claims Status

Current Status

Last 30 Eras Timeline

Payment Speed

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

Current Risk Level

How to Improve Nominator Stability

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

Recent Nominator Behavior

How to Reduce Risk