MathCrypto/03 - Kusama Validator Performance

MathCrypto/03 ✓ Reasonable Poor

France, Reims

Part of MATHCRYPTO cluster - 2 validators · 0.29% of active set · Manage this fleet →

Backed by 2 nomination pools · browse them

Slot

#897

Commission

15%

Nominators

137

Stake

12.6K KSM

Updated

1h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Poor)

Active Set Longevity

153 days

41.8% uptime (153 of 366 observed days)

Current streak: 0 days

Longest streak: 131 days

Commission Stability

100/100

Excellent

Change frequency: 0 per 90 days

Volatility: 0.0%

Expected Returns

N/A

Awaiting data collection

Validator Self-Stake

10 KSM

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings

N/A

Awaiting data collection

Slot Position Volatility

Medium

Avg slot: 897.0 (30 days)

90-day avg: 1038.6

180-day avg: 1108.7

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

✅ All rewards claimed

Total unclaimed: 0/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

5/10

Moderate

Health Score: 48.77/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

5/10

Moderate risk

⚠ Threshold risk

⚠ Low grade

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 9290 Details

MVR: 100.0% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

62/100

Moderate

Stable nominators: 38

Unstable nominators: 3

Total nominators: 137

Stable percentage: 27.7%

Active Set Risk Details

10/10

High risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 16.6% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #897 → #947 (would drop out!)

Risk: CRITICAL

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 26.1% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: CRITICAL

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 5/10 risk = 10 - (48.77/10)

Health Score Breakdown (48.77/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 17.43/30

Longevity: 6.3/15 pts
153 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 10.0/10 pts
No commission changes (10 pts)
Slot Volatility: 1.2/5 pts
StdDev 76.8 → 1.2 pts (Moderate volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 0.0/33

Era Points Consistency: 0.0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 0.0/10 pts
Grade F = 0.0 pts
MVR: 0.0/5 pts
100.00% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -0.0 pts penalty
No unclaimed eras

3. Growth (20 points) 10.0/20

APY Relative Score: 5.0/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 17.0/32

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: MathCrypto/03
Commission Transparency: 5.0/5 pts
No commission changes for 180+ days
Grade Trend: 0.0/5 pts
Grade declined (0 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
No public telemetry
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 14.28/20

Nominator Stability: 6.3/10 pts
27.7% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 4.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 50 slots
Aggregate Risk: 4.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 40 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: France
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 3.0/8

Client Version: 0.0/4 pts
Unknown (neutral 2pts)
Location Quality: 3.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 67.71/146

Normalized Health Score: 48.77/100

Risk Score: 5/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

MODERATE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

27.7%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

38%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

38 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

3 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

27.7% Stable 38% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Moderate Risk: Your nominator base has moderate stability. While 38 nominators have been with you long-term, 3 are relatively new (<90 days). Focus on building relationships with your newer nominators to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

10/10

HIGH RISK

Current Position

#897

in active set

Safety Buffer

-247

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

16.6%

of your stake

→

New Position

#947

▼ 50 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

WOULD DROP OUT! - Loss of this nominator would kick you out of the active set

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 26.1%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 16.6%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income
URGENT: Your buffer is critically low. Focus on attracting new nominators immediately

MathCrypto/03 ✓ Reasonable Poor France, Reims