ALFASTAKE/Zenit - Kusama Validator Performance

ALFASTAKE/Zenit ✓ Reasonable Fair

Norway, Sandefjord (Gigahost AS)

Slot

#338

Commission

15%

Nominators

202

Stake

152.7K KSM

Updated

2h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Active Set Longevity

333 days

100.0% uptime (333 of 333 observed days)

Current streak: 333 days

Longest streak: 333 days

Commission Stability

100/100

Excellent

Change frequency: 0 per 90 days

Volatility: 0.0%

Expected Returns Details

13.8% ↗

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 22.6%

Trend: improving

Avg era reward: 922 KSM

Avg assigned stake: 13,792 KSM

Avg era point share: 0.15%

Based on 85 eras

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

10 KSM

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

13.3 KSM

Total income · 2026-10

● Comm 13.3 ● Self 0.1

Rewards distributed: 89 KSM

vs last month: ↗ +169.1%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Low

Avg slot: 294.2 (30 days)

90-day avg: 280.5

180-day avg: 361.9

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

❌ 21 eras overdue

Overdue (affects health score)

Total unclaimed: 25/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

4/10

Moderate

Health Score: 59.68/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

0/10

No risks detected

✓ No risk flags

⚠️ Unpaid Rewards: 21 eras overdue

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 10156 Details

A+

MVR: 0.0% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

46/100

Unstable

Stable nominators: 77

Unstable nominators: 92

Total nominators: 202

Stable percentage: 38.1%

Active Set Risk Details

0/10

Low risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 36.4% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #338 → #438 (still safe)

Risk: LOW

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 76.6% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: LOW

Node DHT

ZENIT

Parity Polkadot v1.22.2

Network: litep2p

IPv6: -

Multi-homed: -

Source: DHT discovery (telemetry not available)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 4/10 risk = 10 - (59.68/10)

Health Score Breakdown (59.68/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 27.83/30

Longevity: 15.0/15 pts
333 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 10.0/10 pts
No commission changes (10 pts)
Slot Volatility: 2.8/5 pts
StdDev 43.4 → 2.8 pts (Low volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 5.0/33

Era Points Consistency: 0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 10.0/10 pts
Grade A+ = 10.0 pts
MVR: 5.0/5 pts
0.00% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -10.0 pts penalty
-10.0 pts penalty (22 overdue eras past grace period)

3. Growth (20 points) 9.67/20

APY Relative Score: 4.7/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 22.0/32

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: ALFASTAKE/Zenit
Commission Transparency: 5.0/5 pts
No commission changes for 180+ days
Grade Trend: 5.0/5 pts
Grade improved (5 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
No public telemetry
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 6.63/20

Nominator Stability: 4.6/10 pts
38.1% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 2.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 100 slots
Aggregate Risk: 0.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 150 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Norway
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 8.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
v1.22.2-c112e83f4f6 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 4.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 85.13/146

Normalized Health Score: 59.68/100

Risk Score: 4/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

UNSTABLE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

38.1%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

54%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

77 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

92 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

38.1% Stable 54% Unstable

Current Risk Level

High Risk: Your nominator base is unstable with frequent turnover. Only 38.1% of nominators have been with you for 90+ days. This puts you at risk of sudden stake losses that could drop you from the active set. Immediate action needed to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators
Focus on retention: You have more new nominators than stable ones. Prioritize keeping your current nominators happy

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

0/10

LOW RISK

Current Position

#338

in active set

Safety Buffer

262

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

36.4%

of your stake

→

New Position

#438

▼ 100 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

Still Safe - Would remain well within active set with 262 slot buffer

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 76.6%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 36.4%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income

ALFASTAKE/Zenit ✓ Reasonable Fair Norway, Sandefjord (Gigahost AS)

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Health Score Breakdown (59.68/100)

💰 Reward Claims Status

Current Status

Last 30 Eras Timeline

Payment Speed

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

Current Risk Level

How to Improve Nominator Stability

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

Recent Nominator Behavior

How to Reduce Risk