STAKE.ZONE - Kusama Validator Performance

STAKE.ZONE ✓ Reasonable Poor

United States, Miami (ReliableSite.Net LLC)

Backed by 2 nomination pools · browse them

Slot

#689

Commission

15%

Nominators

680

Stake

42.8K KSM

Updated

11h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Poor)

Active Set Longevity

204 days

55.9% uptime (204 of 365 observed days)

Current streak: 11 days

Longest streak: 46 days

Commission Stability

100/100

Excellent

Change frequency: 0 per 90 days

Volatility: 0.0%

Expected Returns Details

0.0% →

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 0.0%

Trend: stable

Avg era reward: 896 KSM

Avg assigned stake: 12,723 KSM

Avg era point share: 0.00%

Based on 58 eras

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

53 KSM

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

0.1 KSM

Total income · 2026-04

● Comm 0.1 ● Self 0.0

Rewards distributed: 1 KSM

vs last month: ↗ +36.9%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Medium

Avg slot: 693.1 (30 days)

90-day avg: 710.2

180-day avg: 718.6

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

❌ 13 eras overdue

Overdue (affects health score)

Total unclaimed: 13/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

5/10

Moderate

Health Score: 47.23/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

3/10

Low risk

⚠ Threshold risk

⚠ Low grade

⚠️ Unpaid Rewards: 13 eras overdue

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 9794 Details

MVR: 100.0% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

85/100

Excellent

Stable nominators: 575

Unstable nominators: 91

Total nominators: 680

Stable percentage: 84.6%

Active Set Risk Details

10/10

High risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 8.1% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #689 → #699 (close to edge)

Risk: HIGH

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 36.7% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: CRITICAL

Node Telemetry

fl5

Parity Polkadot 1.22.0

Peers: 9

Propagation: 555ms

Last snapshot: 2026-04-11 04:34:07

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 5/10 risk = 10 - (47.23/10)

Health Score Breakdown (47.23/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 20.39/30

Longevity: 8.4/15 pts
204 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 10.0/10 pts
No commission changes (10 pts)
Slot Volatility: 2.0/5 pts
StdDev 59.9 → 2.0 pts (Moderate volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) -10.0/33

Era Points Consistency: 0.0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 0.0/10 pts
Grade F = 0.0 pts
MVR: 0.0/5 pts
100.00% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -10.0 pts penalty
-10.0 pts penalty (13 overdue eras past grace period)

3. Growth (20 points) 5.0/20

APY Relative Score: 0.0/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 22.0/32

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: STAKE.ZONE
Commission Transparency: 5.0/5 pts
No commission changes for 180+ days
Grade Trend: 5.0/5 pts
Grade improved (5 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
Public telemetry available (5 pts)
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 15.56/20

Nominator Stability: 8.6/10 pts
84.6% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 5.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 10 slots
Aggregate Risk: 2.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 80 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: United States
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 8.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
1.22.0-2e4dd0bc223 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 4.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 66.95/146

Normalized Health Score: 47.23/100

Risk Score: 5/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

EXCELLENT

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

575

84.6%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

15%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

575 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

91 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

84.6% Stable 15% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Low Risk: You have an excellent stable nominator base. 84.6% of your nominators have been with you for 90+ days, indicating strong commitment and trust. This stability provides a strong foundation for maintaining your active set position.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

10/10

HIGH RISK

Current Position

#689

in active set

Safety Buffer

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

8.1%

of your stake

→

New Position

#699

▼ 10 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

Close to Edge - Only 1 slots from dropping out - very risky!

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 36.7%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income
URGENT: Your buffer is critically low. Focus on attracting new nominators immediately

STAKE.ZONE ✓ Reasonable Poor United States, Miami (ReliableSite.Net LLC)