Rekt Street Capital - Kusama Validator Performance

Rekt Street Capital ✓ Reasonable Poor

United States, Indianapolis (AT&T Enterprises, LLC)

Backed by 2 nomination pools · browse them

Slot

#360

Commission

30%

Nominators

175

Stake

91.5K KSM

Updated

9h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Poor)

Active Set Longevity

248 days

68.0% uptime (248 of 365 observed days)

Current streak: 90 days

Longest streak: 90 days

Commission Stability

57/100

Moderate

Change frequency: 1 per 90 days

Volatility: 3.8%

Last changed: 2026-08-06 22:10:25

Expected Returns Details

10.1% ↘

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 8.6%

Trend: declining

Avg era reward: 919 KSM

Avg assigned stake: 13,752 KSM

Avg era point share: 0.14%

Based on 85 eras

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

0 KSM

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

0.3 KSM

Total income · 2026-09

● Comm 0.3 ● Self 0.0

Rewards distributed: 1 KSM

vs last month: ↘ -99.0%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Medium

Avg slot: 421.6 (30 days)

90-day avg: 465.7

180-day avg: 557.9

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

✅ All rewards claimed

Total unclaimed: 0/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

6/10

Moderate

Health Score: 43.63/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

0/10

No risks detected

✓ No risk flags

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 9974 Details

B+

MVR: 3.74% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

55/100

Moderate

Stable nominators: 35

Unstable nominators: 16

Total nominators: 175

Stable percentage: 20.0%

Active Set Risk Details

3/10

Low risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 45.3% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #360 → #460 (still safe)

Risk: LOW

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 60.0% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: MODERATE

Node DHT

Rekt Street Capital

Parity Polkadot v1.22.2

Network: litep2p

IPv6: -

Multi-homed: -

Source: DHT discovery (telemetry not available)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 6/10 risk = 10 - (43.63/10)

Health Score Breakdown (43.63/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 16.14/30

Longevity: 10.2/15 pts
248 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 5.7/10 pts
1 commission changes over 180 days
Slot Volatility: 0.2/5 pts
StdDev 95.1 → 0.2 pts (Moderate volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 4.81/33

Era Points Consistency: 0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 0.0/10 pts
No Turboflakes grade
MVR: 4.8/5 pts
3.74% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -0.0 pts penalty
No unclaimed eras

3. Growth (20 points) 7.16/20

APY Relative Score: 2.2/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 12.0/32

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: Rekt Street Capital
Commission Transparency: 0.0/5 pts
1 commission changes in 180 days (0 pts)
Grade Trend: 0.0/5 pts
Grade declined (0 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
No public telemetry
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 7.54/20

Nominator Stability: 5.5/10 pts
20.0% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 2.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 100 slots
Aggregate Risk: 0.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 150 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: United States
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 8.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
v1.22.2-c112e83f4f6 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 4.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 61.65/146

Normalized Health Score: 43.63/100

Risk Score: 6/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

MODERATE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

20.0%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

45%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

35 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

16 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

20.0% Stable 45% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Moderate Risk: Your nominator base has moderate stability. While 35 nominators have been with you long-term, 16 are relatively new (<90 days). Focus on building relationships with your newer nominators to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

3/10

LOW RISK

Current Position

#360

in active set

Safety Buffer

240

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

45.3%

of your stake

→

New Position

#460

▼ 100 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

Still Safe - Would remain well within active set with 240 slot buffer

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 60.0%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 45.3%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income

Rekt Street Capital ✓ Reasonable Poor United States, Indianapolis (AT&T Enterprises, LLC)

Performance Metrics (Health: Poor)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Health Score Breakdown (43.63/100)

💰 Reward Claims Status

Current Status

Last 30 Eras Timeline

Payment Speed

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

Current Risk Level

How to Improve Nominator Stability

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

Recent Nominator Behavior

How to Reduce Risk