FaQeh5...62i9JYTx - Kusama Validator Performance

FaQeh5...62i9JYTx Poor

United Kingdom, London (OVH SAS)

Backed by 2 nomination pools · browse them

Slot

#696

Commission

15%

Nominators

Stake

37.3K KSM

Updated

10h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Poor)

Active Set Longevity

292 days

87.7% uptime (292 of 333 observed days)

Current streak: 2 days

Longest streak: 192 days

Commission Stability

100/100

Excellent

Change frequency: 0 per 90 days

Volatility: 0.0%

Expected Returns Details

0.0% →

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 0.0%

Trend: stable

Avg era reward: 922 KSM

Avg assigned stake: 11,591 KSM

Avg era point share: 0.00%

Based on 24 eras

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

0 KSM

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

0.0 KSM

Total income · 2026-08

● Comm 0.0 ● Self 0.0

Rewards distributed: 0 KSM

vs last month: ↘ -99.9%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Low

Avg slot: 702.4 (30 days)

90-day avg: 688.8

180-day avg: 613.7

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

⚠️ 1 era overdue

Overdue (affects health score)

Total unclaimed: 1/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

6/10

Moderate

Health Score: 43.16/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

4/10

Moderate risk

⚠ Threshold risk

⚠ Low grade

⚠️ Unpaid Rewards: 1 era overdue

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 10156 Details

MVR: 100.0% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

60/100

Moderate

Stable nominators: 8

Unstable nominators: 5

Total nominators: 15

Stable percentage: 53.3%

Active Set Risk Details

10/10

High risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 99.4% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #696 → #896 (would drop out!)

Risk: CRITICAL

Recent Nominator Changes:

✓ 0.4% from recent switchers

Stable nominator base

Risk: CRITICAL

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 6/10 risk = 10 - (43.16/10)

Health Score Breakdown (43.16/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 27.01/30

Longevity: 13.2/15 pts
292 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 10.0/10 pts
No commission changes (10 pts)
Slot Volatility: 3.9/5 pts
StdDev 22.9 → 3.9 pts (Low volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) -2.0/33

Era Points Consistency: 0.0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 0.0/10 pts
Grade F = 0.0 pts
MVR: 0.0/5 pts
100.00% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -2.0 pts penalty
-2.0 pts penalty (1 overdue eras past grace period)

3. Growth (20 points) 5.0/20

APY Relative Score: 0.0/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 8.0/32

Identity Completeness: 0.0/12 pts
No on-chain identity
Commission Transparency: 5.0/5 pts
No commission changes for 180+ days
Grade Trend: 3.0/5 pts
Grade stable (3 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
No public telemetry
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 11.0/20

Nominator Stability: 6.0/10 pts
53.3% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 0.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 200 slots
Aggregate Risk: 5.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 10 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: United Kingdom
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 4.0/8

Client Version: 0.0/4 pts
Unknown (neutral 2pts)
Location Quality: 4.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 59.01/146

Normalized Health Score: 43.16/100

Risk Score: 6/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

MODERATE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

53.3%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

40%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

8 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

5 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

53.3% Stable 40% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Moderate Risk: Your nominator base has moderate stability. While 8 nominators have been with you long-term, 5 are relatively new (<90 days). Focus on building relationships with your newer nominators to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

10/10

HIGH RISK

Current Position

#696

in active set

Safety Buffer

-196

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

99.4%

of your stake

→

New Position

#896

▼ 200 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

WOULD DROP OUT! - Loss of this nominator would kick you out of the active set

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 0.4%

What This Means:

Stable Base - Very few nominators have recently switched to you, indicating a stable, committed nominator base

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 99.4%)
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income
URGENT: Your buffer is critically low. Focus on attracting new nominators immediately

FaQeh5...62i9JYTx Poor United Kingdom, London (OVH SAS)