turboflakes.io/COCO - Kusama Validator Performance

turboflakes.io/COCO ✓ Reasonable Fair

Portugal, Lisbon

Part of TURBOFLAKESIO cluster - 6 validators · 0.86% of active set · Manage this fleet →

Backed by 11 nomination pools · browse them

Slot

#134

Commission

15%

Nominators

345

Stake

101.1K KSM

Updated

13h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Active Set Longevity

317 days

86.8% uptime (317 of 365 observed days)

Current streak: 242 days

Longest streak: 242 days

Commission Stability

100/100

Excellent

Change frequency: 0 per 90 days

Volatility: 0.0%

Expected Returns Details

14.9% ↘

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 14.3%

Trend: declining

Avg era reward: 895 KSM

Avg assigned stake: 12,695 KSM

Avg era point share: 0.16%

Based on 85 eras

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

101 KSM

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

15.6 KSM

Total income · 2026-07

● Comm 15.0 ● Self 0.7

Rewards distributed: 100 KSM

vs last month: ↗ +392.9%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

High

Avg slot: 181.5 (30 days)

90-day avg: 263.5

180-day avg: 382.4

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

✅ All rewards claimed

Total unclaimed: 0/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

4/10

Moderate

Health Score: 62.01/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

0/10

No risks detected

✓ No risk flags

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 9794 Details

A+

MVR: 0.11% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

45/100

Unstable

Stable nominators: 134

Unstable nominators: 164

Total nominators: 345

Stable percentage: 38.8%

Active Set Risk Details

0/10

Low risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 17.9% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #134 → #184 (still safe)

Risk: LOW

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 73.9% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: LOW

Node DHT

turboflakes-1

Parity Polkadot v1.22.2

Network: litep2p

IPv6: -

Multi-homed: ✓ Yes

Source: DHT discovery (telemetry not available)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 4/10 risk = 10 - (62.01/10)

Health Score Breakdown (62.01/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 23.03/30

Longevity: 13.0/15 pts
317 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 10.0/10 pts
No commission changes (10 pts)
Slot Volatility: 0/5 pts
StdDev 104.0 → 0.0 pts (High volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 14.99/33

Era Points Consistency: 0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 10.0/10 pts
Grade A+ = 10.0 pts
MVR: 5.0/5 pts
0.11% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -0.0 pts penalty
No unclaimed eras

3. Growth (20 points) 11.95/20

APY Relative Score: 7.0/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 20.0/32

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: turboflakes.io/COCO
Commission Transparency: 5.0/5 pts
No commission changes for 180+ days
Grade Trend: 3.0/5 pts
Grade stable (3 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
No public telemetry
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 8.56/20

Nominator Stability: 4.6/10 pts
38.8% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 4.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 50 slots
Aggregate Risk: 0.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 150 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Portugal
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 7.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
v1.22.2-c112e83f4f6 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 3.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 91.53/146

Normalized Health Score: 62.01/100

Risk Score: 4/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

UNSTABLE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

134

38.8%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

164

55%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

134 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

164 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

38.8% Stable 55% Unstable

Current Risk Level

High Risk: Your nominator base is unstable with frequent turnover. Only 38.8% of nominators have been with you for 90+ days. This puts you at risk of sudden stake losses that could drop you from the active set. Immediate action needed to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators
Focus on retention: You have more new nominators than stable ones. Prioritize keeping your current nominators happy

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

0/10

LOW RISK

Current Position

#134

in active set

Safety Buffer

516

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

17.9%

of your stake

→

New Position

#184

▼ 50 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

Still Safe - Would remain well within active set with 516 slot buffer

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 73.9%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 17.9%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income

turboflakes.io/COCO ✓ Reasonable Fair Portugal, Lisbon

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Health Score Breakdown (62.01/100)

💰 Reward Claims Status

Current Status

Last 30 Eras Timeline

Payment Speed

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

Current Risk Level

How to Improve Nominator Stability

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

Recent Nominator Behavior

How to Reduce Risk