Jaco/v33 - Kusama Validator Performance

Jaco/v33 ✓ Verified Poor

Germany, Saarbrucken

Part of JACO cluster - 9 validators · 1.29% of active set · Manage this fleet →

Backed by 4 nomination pools · browse them

Slot

#844

Commission

15%

Nominators

Stake

34.2K KSM

Updated

8h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Poor)

Active Set Longevity

0 days

0.0% uptime (0 of 365 observed days)

Current streak: 0 days

Longest streak: 0 days

Commission Stability

100/100

Excellent

Change frequency: 0 per 90 days

Volatility: 0.0%

Expected Returns Details

Not in active set — last active era 9713 (81 eras ago)

24.6% →

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Last active-era rate (era 9713): 27.7%

Trend: stable

Avg era reward: 901 KSM

Avg assigned stake: 7,828 KSM

Avg era point share: 0.15%

Based on 4 eras

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

1 KSM

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

0.8 KSM

Total income · 2026-06

● Comm 0.8 ● Self 0.0

Rewards distributed: 6 KSM

vs last month: ↗ +422.7%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Medium

Avg slot: 891.5 (30 days)

90-day avg: 977.1

180-day avg: 988.8

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

⚠️ 1 era overdue

Overdue (affects health score)

Total unclaimed: 1/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

5/10

Moderate

Health Score: 46.72/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

3/10

Low risk

⚠ Threshold risk

⚠️ Unpaid Rewards: 1 era overdue

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 9713 Details

A+

MVR: 0.0% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

54/100

Moderate

Stable nominators: 42

Unstable nominators: 35

Total nominators: 82

Stable percentage: 51.2%

Active Set Risk Details

10/10

High risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 12.2% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #844 → #854 (would drop out!)

Risk: CRITICAL

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 28.1% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: CRITICAL

Node DHT

teufel-09-33

Parity Polkadot v1.20.0

Network: litep2p

IPv6: -

Multi-homed: ✓ Yes

Source: DHT discovery (telemetry not available)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 5/10 risk = 10 - (46.72/10)

Health Score Breakdown (46.72/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 11.28/30

Longevity: 0.0/15 pts
0 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 10.0/10 pts
No commission changes (10 pts)
Slot Volatility: 1.3/5 pts
StdDev 74.4 → 1.3 pts (Moderate volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 13.0/33

Era Points Consistency: 0.0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 10.0/10 pts
Grade A+ = 10.0 pts
MVR: 5.0/5 pts
0.00% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -2.0 pts penalty
-2.0 pts penalty (1 overdue eras past grace period)

3. Growth (20 points) 15.0/20

APY Relative Score: 10.0/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 17.0/32

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: Jaco/v33
Commission Transparency: 5.0/5 pts
No commission changes for 180+ days
Grade Trend: 0.0/5 pts
Grade declined (0 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
No public telemetry
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 14.43/20

Nominator Stability: 5.4/10 pts
51.2% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 5.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 10 slots
Aggregate Risk: 4.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 40 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Germany
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 5.0/8

Client Version: 2.0/4 pts
v1.20.0-5ab401310d2 = 1 version behind (2pts)
Location Quality: 3.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 81.71/146

Normalized Health Score: 46.72/100

Risk Score: 5/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

MODERATE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

51.2%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

46%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

42 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

35 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

51.2% Stable 46% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Moderate Risk: Your nominator base has moderate stability. While 42 nominators have been with you long-term, 35 are relatively new (<90 days). Focus on building relationships with your newer nominators to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

10/10

HIGH RISK

Current Position

#844

in active set

Safety Buffer

-154

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

12.2%

of your stake

→

New Position

#854

▼ 10 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

WOULD DROP OUT! - Loss of this nominator would kick you out of the active set

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 28.1%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income
URGENT: Your buffer is critically low. Focus on attracting new nominators immediately

Jaco/v33 ✓ Verified Poor Germany, Saarbrucken