ParaNodes.io/05🚀 - Kusama Validator Performance

ParaNodes.io/05🚀 ✓ Verified Poor

United States of America, Dover

Part of PARANODESIO cluster - 9 validators · 1.29% of active set · Manage this fleet →

Backed by 2 nomination pools · browse them

Slot

#172

Commission

50%

Nominators

192

Stake

54.3K KSM

Updated

11h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Poor)

Active Set Longevity

89 days

24.4% uptime (89 of 365 observed days)

Current streak: 25 days

Longest streak: 44 days

Commission Stability

44/100

Unstable

Change frequency: 1 per 90 days

Volatility: 8.9%

Last changed: 2026-07-04 22:10:34

Expected Returns Details

8.7% ↘

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 7.6%

Trend: declining

Avg era reward: 895 KSM

Avg assigned stake: 12,665 KSM

Avg era point share: 0.14%

Based on 79 eras

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

10 KSM

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

38.0 KSM

Total income · 2026-07

● Comm 38.0 ● Self 0.0

Rewards distributed: 84 KSM

vs last month: ↗ +703.8%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

High

Avg slot: 371.0 (30 days)

90-day avg: 698.0

180-day avg: 855.4

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

✅ All rewards claimed

Total unclaimed: 0/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

5/10

Moderate

Health Score: 46.14/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

0/10

No risks detected

✓ No risk flags

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 9794 Details

MVR: 22.09% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

66/100

Moderate

Stable nominators: 119

Unstable nominators: 56

Total nominators: 192

Stable percentage: 62.0%

Active Set Risk Details

0/10

Low risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 25.5% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #172 → #222 (still safe)

Risk: LOW

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 32.2% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: LOW

Node Telemetry

Dox-KSM-05

Parity Polkadot 1.24.0

Peers: 14

Propagation: 534ms

Last snapshot: 2026-07-11 04:34:02

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 5/10 risk = 10 - (46.14/10)

Health Score Breakdown (46.14/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 8.06/30

Longevity: 3.7/15 pts
89 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 4.4/10 pts
1 commission changes over 180 days
Slot Volatility: 0/5 pts
StdDev 353.2 → 0.0 pts (High volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 9.9/33

Era Points Consistency: 0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 6.0/10 pts
Grade B = 6.0 pts
MVR: 3.9/5 pts
22.09% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -0.0 pts penalty
No unclaimed eras

3. Growth (20 points) 6.91/20

APY Relative Score: 1.9/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 17.0/32

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: ParaNodes.io/05🚀
Commission Transparency: 0.0/5 pts
1 commission changes in 180 days (0 pts)
Grade Trend: 0.0/5 pts
Grade declined (0 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 5.0/5 pts
Public telemetry available (5 pts)
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 12.64/20

Nominator Stability: 6.6/10 pts
62.0% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 4.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 50 slots
Aggregate Risk: 2.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 80 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: United States of America
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 7.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
1.24.0-660acefe665 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 3.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 67.51/146

Normalized Health Score: 46.14/100

Risk Score: 5/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

MODERATE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

119

62.0%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

34%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

119 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

56 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

62.0% Stable 34% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Moderate Risk: Your nominator base has moderate stability. While 119 nominators have been with you long-term, 56 are relatively new (<90 days). Focus on building relationships with your newer nominators to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

0/10

LOW RISK

Current Position

#172

in active set

Safety Buffer

478

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

25.5%

of your stake

→

New Position

#222

▼ 50 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

Still Safe - Would remain well within active set with 478 slot buffer

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 32.2%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 25.5%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income

ParaNodes.io/05🚀 ✓ Verified Poor United States of America, Dover

Performance Metrics (Health: Poor)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Health Score Breakdown (46.14/100)

💰 Reward Claims Status

Current Status

Last 30 Eras Timeline

Payment Speed

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

Current Risk Level

How to Improve Nominator Stability

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

Recent Nominator Behavior

How to Reduce Risk