Stakely/1 - Kusama Validator Performance

Stakely/1 ✓ Reasonable Fair

Sweden, Stockholm (UAB Cherry Servers)

Part of the Stakely fleet · 5 validators · See the fleet →

Backed by 2 nomination pools · browse them

Slot

#522

Commission

20%

Nominators

355

Stake

33.9K KSM

Updated

9h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Active Set Longevity

355 days

97.3% uptime (355 of 365 observed days)

Current streak: 164 days

Longest streak: 164 days

Commission Stability

98/100

Excellent

Change frequency: 0 per 90 days

Volatility: 1.1%

Last changed: 2025-09-12 22:11:33

Expected Returns Details

11.2% ↘

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 5.7%

Trend: declining

Avg era reward: 919 KSM

Avg assigned stake: 13,769 KSM

Avg era point share: 0.14%

Based on 85 eras

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

250 KSM

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

0.1 KSM

Total income · 2026-09

● Comm 0.1 ● Self 0.0

Rewards distributed: 1 KSM

vs last month: ↘ -99.4%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Medium

Avg slot: 437.5 (30 days)

90-day avg: 488.1

180-day avg: 540.7

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

⚠️ 3 eras overdue

Overdue (affects health score)

Total unclaimed: 8/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

4/10

Moderate

Health Score: 64.94/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

2/10

Low risk

⚠ Low era points

⚠️ Unpaid Rewards: 3 eras overdue

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 9974 Details

A+

MVR: 0.0% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

83/100

Excellent

Stable nominators: 265

Unstable nominators: 29

Total nominators: 355

Stable percentage: 74.7%

Active Set Risk Details

6/10

Moderate risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 39.8% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #522 → #622 (close to edge)

Risk: HIGH

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 11.7% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: LOW

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 4/10 risk = 10 - (64.94/10)

Health Score Breakdown (64.94/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 25.91/30

Longevity: 14.6/15 pts
355 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 9.8/10 pts
No commission changes (10 pts)
Slot Volatility: 1.5/5 pts
StdDev 69.6 → 1.5 pts (Moderate volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 10.0/33

Era Points Consistency: 0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 10.0/10 pts
Grade A+ = 10.0 pts
MVR: 5.0/5 pts
0.00% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -5.0 pts penalty
-5.0 pts penalty (3 overdue eras past grace period)

3. Growth (20 points) 7.59/20

APY Relative Score: 2.6/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 22.0/32

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: Stakely/1
Commission Transparency: 5.0/5 pts
No commission changes for 180+ days
Grade Trend: 5.0/5 pts
Grade improved (5 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
No public telemetry
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 15.32/20

Nominator Stability: 8.3/10 pts
74.7% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 2.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 100 slots
Aggregate Risk: 5.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 10 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Sweden
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 4.0/8

Client Version: 0.0/4 pts
Unknown (neutral 2pts)
Location Quality: 4.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 90.82/146

Normalized Health Score: 64.94/100

Risk Score: 4/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

EXCELLENT

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

265

74.7%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

17%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

265 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

29 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

74.7% Stable 17% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Low Risk: You have an excellent stable nominator base. 74.7% of your nominators have been with you for 90+ days, indicating strong commitment and trust. This stability provides a strong foundation for maintaining your active set position.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

6/10

MODERATE RISK

Current Position

#522

in active set

Safety Buffer

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

39.8%

of your stake

→

New Position

#622

▼ 100 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

Close to Edge - Only 78 slots from dropping out - very risky!

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 11.7%

What This Means:

Some Turnover - Moderate amount of recent switchers. These nominators may be less committed and could leave for other validators

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 39.8%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income
URGENT: Your buffer is critically low. Focus on attracting new nominators immediately

Stakely/1 ✓ Reasonable Fair Sweden, Stockholm (UAB Cherry Servers)