Stakely/1 - Kusama Validator Performance

Stakely/1 ✓ Reasonable Fair

Sweden, Stockholm (UAB Cherry Servers)

Part of the Stakely fleet · 5 validators · See the fleet →

Backed by 2 nomination pools · browse them

Slot

#518

Commission

20%

Nominators

336

Stake

33.2K KSM

Updated

1h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Active Set Longevity

323 days

97.0% uptime (323 of 333 observed days)

Current streak: 210 days

Longest streak: 210 days

Commission Stability

100/100

Excellent

Change frequency: 0 per 90 days

Volatility: 0.0%

Expected Returns Details

12.0% →

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 6.5%

Trend: stable

Avg era reward: 922 KSM

Avg assigned stake: 13,869 KSM

Avg era point share: 0.14%

Based on 85 eras

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

250 KSM

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

18.2 KSM

Total income · 2026-10

● Comm 16.9 ● Self 1.2

Rewards distributed: 85 KSM

vs last month: ↗ +189.1%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Medium

Avg slot: 534.9 (30 days)

90-day avg: 482.1

180-day avg: 520.7

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

❌ 12 eras overdue

Overdue (affects health score)

Total unclaimed: 16/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

4/10

Moderate

Health Score: 62.58/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

0/10

No risks detected

✓ No risk flags

⚠️ Unpaid Rewards: 12 eras overdue

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 10156 Details

A+

MVR: 0.0% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

87/100

Excellent

Stable nominators: 270

Unstable nominators: 17

Total nominators: 336

Stable percentage: 80.4%

Active Set Risk Details

6/10

Moderate risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 41.3% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #518 → #618 (close to edge)

Risk: HIGH

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 7.1% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: LOW

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 4/10 risk = 10 - (62.58/10)

Health Score Breakdown (62.58/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 26.37/30

Longevity: 14.6/15 pts
323 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 10.0/10 pts
No commission changes (10 pts)
Slot Volatility: 1.8/5 pts
StdDev 63.7 → 1.8 pts (Moderate volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 5.0/33

Era Points Consistency: 0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 10.0/10 pts
Grade A+ = 10.0 pts
MVR: 5.0/5 pts
0.00% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -10.0 pts penalty
-10.0 pts penalty (12 overdue eras past grace period)

3. Growth (20 points) 8.24/20

APY Relative Score: 3.2/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 22.0/32

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: Stakely/1
Commission Transparency: 5.0/5 pts
No commission changes for 180+ days
Grade Trend: 5.0/5 pts
Grade improved (5 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
No public telemetry
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 15.77/20

Nominator Stability: 8.8/10 pts
80.4% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 2.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 100 slots
Aggregate Risk: 5.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 10 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Sweden
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 4.0/8

Client Version: 0.0/4 pts
Unknown (neutral 2pts)
Location Quality: 4.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 87.38/146

Normalized Health Score: 62.58/100

Risk Score: 4/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

EXCELLENT

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

270

80.4%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

13%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

270 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

17 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

80.4% Stable 13% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Low Risk: You have an excellent stable nominator base. 80.4% of your nominators have been with you for 90+ days, indicating strong commitment and trust. This stability provides a strong foundation for maintaining your active set position.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

6/10

MODERATE RISK

Current Position

#518

in active set

Safety Buffer

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

41.3%

of your stake

→

New Position

#618

▼ 100 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

Close to Edge - Only 82 slots from dropping out - very risky!

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 7.1%

What This Means:

Some Turnover - Moderate amount of recent switchers. These nominators may be less committed and could leave for other validators

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 41.3%)
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income
URGENT: Your buffer is critically low. Focus on attracting new nominators immediately

Stakely/1 ✓ Reasonable Fair Sweden, Stockholm (UAB Cherry Servers)