Stakely/1 - Kusama Validator Performance

Stakely/1 ✓ Reasonable Fair

Sweden, Stockholm (UAB Cherry Servers)

Part of the Stakely fleet · 5 validators · See the fleet →

Backed by 2 nomination pools · browse them

Slot

#459

Commission

20%

Nominators

358

Stake

53.9K KSM

Updated

7h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Active Set Longevity

355 days

97.3% uptime (355 of 365 observed days)

Current streak: 119 days

Longest streak: 205 days

Commission Stability

96/100

Excellent

Change frequency: 0 per 90 days

Volatility: 2.0%

Last changed: 2025-09-12 22:11:33

Expected Returns Details

12.1% ↗

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 14.1%

Trend: improving

Avg era reward: 895 KSM

Avg assigned stake: 13,077 KSM

Avg era point share: 0.14%

Based on 85 eras

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

250 KSM

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

19.8 KSM

Total income · 2026-07

● Comm 18.4 ● Self 1.4

Rewards distributed: 92 KSM

vs last month: ↗ +452.9%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Low

Avg slot: 535.9 (30 days)

90-day avg: 559.1

180-day avg: 588.0

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

❌ 14 eras overdue

Overdue (affects health score)

Total unclaimed: 18/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

4/10

Moderate

Health Score: 59.38/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

0/10

No risks detected

✓ No risk flags

⚠️ Unpaid Rewards: 14 eras overdue

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 9794 Details

A+

MVR: 0.22% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

82/100

Excellent

Stable nominators: 276

Unstable nominators: 42

Total nominators: 358

Stable percentage: 77.1%

Active Set Risk Details

10/10

High risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 39.5% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #459 → #559 (moderate buffer)

Risk: MODERATE

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 50.9% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: HIGH

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 4/10 risk = 10 - (59.38/10)

Health Score Breakdown (59.38/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 27.23/30

Longevity: 14.6/15 pts
355 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 9.6/10 pts
No commission changes (10 pts)
Slot Volatility: 3.0/5 pts
StdDev 39.0 → 3.1 pts (Low volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 4.99/33

Era Points Consistency: 0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 10.0/10 pts
Grade A+ = 10.0 pts
MVR: 5.0/5 pts
0.22% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -10.0 pts penalty
-10.0 pts penalty (14 overdue eras past grace period)

3. Growth (20 points) 8.21/20

APY Relative Score: 3.2/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 22.0/32

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: Stakely/1
Commission Transparency: 5.0/5 pts
No commission changes for 180+ days
Grade Trend: 5.0/5 pts
Grade improved (5 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
No public telemetry
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 10.27/20

Nominator Stability: 8.3/10 pts
77.1% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 2.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 100 slots
Aggregate Risk: 0.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 150 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Sweden
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 4.0/8

Client Version: 0.0/4 pts
Unknown (neutral 2pts)
Location Quality: 4.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 82.70/146

Normalized Health Score: 59.38/100

Risk Score: 4/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

EXCELLENT

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

276

77.1%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

18%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

276 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

42 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

77.1% Stable 18% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Low Risk: You have an excellent stable nominator base. 77.1% of your nominators have been with you for 90+ days, indicating strong commitment and trust. This stability provides a strong foundation for maintaining your active set position.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

10/10

HIGH RISK

Current Position

#459

in active set

Safety Buffer

141

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

39.5%

of your stake

→

New Position

#559

▼ 100 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

Moderate Buffer - Would remain in active set but closer to the edge (141 slot buffer)

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 50.9%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 39.5%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income

Stakely/1 ✓ Reasonable Fair Sweden, Stockholm (UAB Cherry Servers)