EXKimA...PvGi3C2U - Kusama Validator Performance

EXKimA...PvGi3C2U Poor

Singapore, Singapore (OVH SAS)

Slot

#355

Commission

15%

Nominators

Stake

32.9K KSM

Updated

11h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Poor)

Active Set Longevity

344 days

94.2% uptime (344 of 365 observed days)

Current streak: 150 days

Longest streak: 150 days

Commission Stability

100/100

Excellent

Change frequency: 0 per 90 days

Volatility: 0.0%

Expected Returns Details

0.0% →

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 0.0%

Trend: stable

Avg era reward: 919 KSM

Avg assigned stake: 13,766 KSM

Avg era point share: 0.00%

Based on 85 eras

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

720 KSM

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

0.0 KSM

Total income · 2026-07

● Comm 0.0 ● Self 0.0

Rewards distributed: 0 KSM

vs last month: ↘ -99.9%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Medium

Avg slot: 375.4 (30 days)

90-day avg: 391.0

180-day avg: 457.7

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

❌ 13 eras overdue

Overdue (affects health score)

Total unclaimed: 13/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

6/10

Moderate

Health Score: 38.59/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

2/10

Low risk

⚠ Low grade

⚠️ Unpaid Rewards: 13 eras overdue

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 9974 Details

MVR: 100.0% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

67/100

Moderate

Stable nominators: 37

Unstable nominators: 8

Total nominators: 82

Stable percentage: 45.1%

Active Set Risk Details

0/10

Low risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 38.2% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #355 → #455 (still safe)

Risk: LOW

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 15.4% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: LOW

Node Telemetry

valuable-sofa-0289

Parity Polkadot 1.22.0

Peers: 19

Propagation: 693ms

Last snapshot: 2026-06-21 04:34:02

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 6/10 risk = 10 - (38.59/10)

Health Score Breakdown (38.59/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 24.57/30

Longevity: 14.1/15 pts
344 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 10.0/10 pts
No commission changes (10 pts)
Slot Volatility: 0.4/5 pts
StdDev 91.3 → 0.4 pts (Moderate volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) -10.0/33

Era Points Consistency: 0.0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 0.0/10 pts
Grade F = 0.0 pts
MVR: 0.0/5 pts
100.00% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -10.0 pts penalty
-10.0 pts penalty (13 overdue eras past grace period)

3. Growth (20 points) 5.0/20

APY Relative Score: 0.0/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 9.0/32

Identity Completeness: 0.0/12 pts
No on-chain identity
Commission Transparency: 5.0/5 pts
No commission changes for 180+ days
Grade Trend: 3.0/5 pts
Grade stable (3 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
Public telemetry available (5 pts)
Self-Stake Confidence: 1.0/5 pts
Low commitment (1-5% self-stake)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 12.77/20

Nominator Stability: 6.8/10 pts
45.1% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 2.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 100 slots
Aggregate Risk: 4.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 40 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Singapore
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 8.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
1.22.0-2e4dd0bc223 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 4.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 55.34/146

Normalized Health Score: 38.59/100

Risk Score: 6/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

MODERATE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

45.1%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

33%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

37 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

8 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

45.1% Stable 33% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Moderate Risk: Your nominator base has moderate stability. While 37 nominators have been with you long-term, 8 are relatively new (<90 days). Focus on building relationships with your newer nominators to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

0/10

LOW RISK

Current Position

#355

in active set

Safety Buffer

245

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

38.2%

of your stake

→

New Position

#455

▼ 100 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

Still Safe - Would remain well within active set with 245 slot buffer

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 15.4%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 38.2%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income

EXKimA...PvGi3C2U Poor Singapore, Singapore (OVH SAS)