EXKimA...PvGi3C2U - Kusama Validator Performance

EXKimA...PvGi3C2U Poor

Singapore, Singapore (OVH SAS)

Slot

#339

Commission

15%

Nominators

Stake

32.9K KSM

Updated

9h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Poor)

Active Set Longevity

339 days

92.9% uptime (339 of 365 observed days)

Current streak: 105 days

Longest streak: 105 days

Commission Stability

100/100

Excellent

Change frequency: 0 per 90 days

Volatility: 0.0%

Expected Returns Details

0.0% ↘

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 0.0%

Trend: declining

Avg era reward: 895 KSM

Avg assigned stake: 12,709 KSM

Avg era point share: 0.00%

Based on 83 eras

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

720 KSM

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

0.0 KSM

Total income · 2026-07

● Comm 0.0 ● Self 0.0

Rewards distributed: 0 KSM

vs last month: ↘ -99.9%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

High

Avg slot: 389.8 (30 days)

90-day avg: 435.4

180-day avg: 533.2

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

❌ 13 eras overdue

Overdue (affects health score)

Total unclaimed: 13/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

6/10

Moderate

Health Score: 37.27/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

2/10

Low risk

⚠ Low grade

⚠️ Unpaid Rewards: 13 eras overdue

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 9794 Details

MVR: 100.0% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

54/100

Moderate

Stable nominators: 44

Unstable nominators: 36

Total nominators: 83

Stable percentage: 53.0%

Active Set Risk Details

0/10

Low risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 37.6% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #339 → #439 (still safe)

Risk: LOW

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 45.7% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: LOW

Node Telemetry

valuable-sofa-0289

Parity Polkadot 1.22.0

Peers: 19

Propagation: 693ms

Last snapshot: 2026-06-21 04:34:02

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 6/10 risk = 10 - (37.27/10)

Health Score Breakdown (37.27/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 23.93/30

Longevity: 13.9/15 pts
339 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 10.0/10 pts
No commission changes (10 pts)
Slot Volatility: 0/5 pts
StdDev 106.7 → 0.0 pts (High volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) -10.0/33

Era Points Consistency: 0.0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 0.0/10 pts
Grade F = 0.0 pts
MVR: 0.0/5 pts
100.00% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -10.0 pts penalty
-10.0 pts penalty (13 overdue eras past grace period)

3. Growth (20 points) 5.0/20

APY Relative Score: 0.0/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 11.0/32

Identity Completeness: 0.0/12 pts
No on-chain identity
Commission Transparency: 5.0/5 pts
No commission changes for 180+ days
Grade Trend: 5.0/5 pts
Grade improved (5 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
Public telemetry available (5 pts)
Self-Stake Confidence: 1.0/5 pts
Low commitment (1-5% self-stake)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 9.48/20

Nominator Stability: 5.5/10 pts
53.0% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 2.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 100 slots
Aggregate Risk: 2.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 80 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Singapore
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 8.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
1.22.0-2e4dd0bc223 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 4.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 53.41/146

Normalized Health Score: 37.27/100

Risk Score: 6/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

MODERATE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

53.0%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

46%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

44 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

36 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

53.0% Stable 46% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Moderate Risk: Your nominator base has moderate stability. While 44 nominators have been with you long-term, 36 are relatively new (<90 days). Focus on building relationships with your newer nominators to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

0/10

LOW RISK

Current Position

#339

in active set

Safety Buffer

261

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

37.6%

of your stake

→

New Position

#439

▼ 100 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

Still Safe - Would remain well within active set with 261 slot buffer

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 45.7%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 37.6%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income

EXKimA...PvGi3C2U Poor Singapore, Singapore (OVH SAS)