EX98wx...Gnu9Q1ur - Kusama Validator Performance

EX98wx...Gnu9Q1ur Critical

Singapore, Singapore

Slot

#623

Commission

15%

Nominators

Stake

28.7K KSM

Updated

13h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Critical)

Active Set Longevity

207 days

56.7% uptime (207 of 365 observed days)

Current streak: 56 days

Longest streak: 56 days

Commission Stability

100/100

Excellent

Change frequency: 0 per 90 days

Volatility: 0.0%

Expected Returns Details

0.0% →

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 0.0%

Trend: stable

Avg era reward: 895 KSM

Avg assigned stake: 12,706 KSM

Avg era point share: 0.00%

Based on 81 eras

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

796 KSM

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

0.1 KSM

Total income · 2026-06

● Comm 0.1 ● Self 0.0

Rewards distributed: 0 KSM

vs last month: ↘ -79.9%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Medium

Avg slot: 585.0 (30 days)

90-day avg: 625.2

180-day avg: 655.4

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

❌ 13 eras overdue

Overdue (affects health score)

Total unclaimed: 13/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

7/10

High

Health Score: 29.92/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

2/10

Low risk

⚠ Low grade

⚠️ Unpaid Rewards: 13 eras overdue

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 9794 Details

MVR: 100.0% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

52/100

Moderate

Stable nominators: 40

Unstable nominators: 36

Total nominators: 84

Stable percentage: 47.6%

Active Set Risk Details

10/10

High risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 43.1% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #623 → #723 (would drop out!)

Risk: CRITICAL

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 58.0% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: CRITICAL

Node Telemetry

bint2

Parity Polkadot 1.22.0

Peers: 17

Propagation: 784ms

Last snapshot: 2026-06-21 04:34:02

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 7/10 risk = 10 - (29.92/10)

Health Score Breakdown (29.92/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 19.45/30

Longevity: 8.5/15 pts
207 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 10.0/10 pts
No commission changes (10 pts)
Slot Volatility: 0.9/5 pts
StdDev 81.3 → 0.9 pts (Moderate volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) -10.0/33

Era Points Consistency: 0.0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 0.0/10 pts
Grade F = 0.0 pts
MVR: 0.0/5 pts
100.00% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -10.0 pts penalty
-10.0 pts penalty (13 overdue eras past grace period)

3. Growth (20 points) 5.0/20

APY Relative Score: 0.0/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 11.0/32

Identity Completeness: 0.0/12 pts
No on-chain identity
Commission Transparency: 5.0/5 pts
No commission changes for 180+ days
Grade Trend: 5.0/5 pts
Grade improved (5 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
Public telemetry available (5 pts)
Self-Stake Confidence: 1.0/5 pts
Low commitment (1-5% self-stake)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 7.24/20

Nominator Stability: 5.2/10 pts
47.6% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 2.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 100 slots
Aggregate Risk: 0.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 150 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Singapore
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 7.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
1.22.0-2e4dd0bc223 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 3.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 45.69/146

Normalized Health Score: 29.92/100

Risk Score: 7/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

MODERATE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

47.6%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

48%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

40 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

36 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

47.6% Stable 48% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Moderate Risk: Your nominator base has moderate stability. While 40 nominators have been with you long-term, 36 are relatively new (<90 days). Focus on building relationships with your newer nominators to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

10/10

HIGH RISK

Current Position

#623

in active set

Safety Buffer

-23

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

43.1%

of your stake

→

New Position

#723

▼ 100 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

WOULD DROP OUT! - Loss of this nominator would kick you out of the active set

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 58.0%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 43.1%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income
URGENT: Your buffer is critically low. Focus on attracting new nominators immediately

EX98wx...Gnu9Q1ur Critical Singapore, Singapore