ondin3 - Kusama Validator Performance

ondin3 Fair

Norway, Sandefjord (Gigahost AS)

Slot

#497

Commission

85%

Nominators

Stake

107.5K KSM

Updated

9h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Active Set Longevity

365 days

100.0% uptime (365 of 365 observed days)

Current streak: 365 days

Longest streak: 365 days

Commission Stability

80/100

Excellent

Change frequency: 0 per 90 days

Volatility: 26.7%

Last changed: 2026-01-31 13:46:42

Expected Returns Details

2.1% ↘

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 1.7%

Trend: declining

Avg era reward: 919 KSM

Avg assigned stake: 13,815 KSM

Avg era point share: 0.14%

Based on 85 eras

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

5 KSM

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

0.9 KSM

Total income · 2026-09

● Comm 0.9 ● Self 0.0

Rewards distributed: 1 KSM

vs last month: ↘ -99.0%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Low

Avg slot: 494.2 (30 days)

90-day avg: 485.4

180-day avg: 500.3

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

✅ All rewards claimed

Total unclaimed: 0/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

3/10

Safe

Health Score: 67.7/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

0/10

No risks detected

✓ No risk flags

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 9974 Details

A+

MVR: 0.0% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

71/100

Moderate

Stable nominators: 11

Unstable nominators: 1

Total nominators: 23

Stable percentage: 47.8%

Active Set Risk Details

3/10

Low risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 49.8% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #497 → #597 (moderate buffer)

Risk: MODERATE

Recent Nominator Changes:

✓ 0.3% from recent switchers

Stable nominator base

Risk: LOW

Node DHT

skinny-caption-0605

Parity Polkadot v1.22.2

Network: litep2p

IPv6: -

Multi-homed: -

Source: DHT discovery (telemetry not available)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 3/10 risk = 10 - (67.7/10)

Health Score Breakdown (67.7/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 27.31/30

Longevity: 15.0/15 pts
365 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 8.0/10 pts
No commission changes (10 pts)
Slot Volatility: 4.3/5 pts
StdDev 13.9 → 4.3 pts (Low volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 15.0/33

Era Points Consistency: 0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 10.0/10 pts
Grade A+ = 10.0 pts
MVR: 5.0/5 pts
0.00% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -0.0 pts penalty
No unclaimed eras

3. Growth (20 points) 6.37/20

APY Relative Score: 1.4/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 20.0/32

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: ondin3
Commission Transparency: 5.0/5 pts
No commission changes for 180+ days
Grade Trend: 3.0/5 pts
Grade stable (3 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
No public telemetry
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 14.17/20

Nominator Stability: 7.2/10 pts
47.8% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 2.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 100 slots
Aggregate Risk: 5.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 10 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Norway
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 8.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
v1.22.2-c112e83f4f6 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 4.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 96.85/146

Normalized Health Score: 67.7/100

Risk Score: 3/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

MODERATE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

47.8%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

29%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

11 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

1 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

47.8% Stable 29% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Moderate Risk: Your nominator base has moderate stability. While 11 nominators have been with you long-term, 1 are relatively new (<90 days). Focus on building relationships with your newer nominators to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

3/10

LOW RISK

Current Position

#497

in active set

Safety Buffer

103

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

49.8%

of your stake

→

New Position

#597

▼ 100 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

Moderate Buffer - Would remain in active set but closer to the edge (103 slot buffer)

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 0.3%

What This Means:

Stable Base - Very few nominators have recently switched to you, indicating a stable, committed nominator base

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 49.8%)
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income

ondin3 Fair Norway, Sandefjord (Gigahost AS)

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Health Score Breakdown (67.7/100)

💰 Reward Claims Status

Current Status

Last 30 Eras Timeline

Payment Speed

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

Current Risk Level

How to Improve Nominator Stability

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

Recent Nominator Behavior

How to Reduce Risk