Stakeflow - Kusama Validator Performance

Stakeflow ✓ Reasonable Fair

Poland, Warsaw

Part of STAKEFLOW cluster - 2 validators · 0.29% of active set · Manage this fleet →

Backed by 3 nomination pools · browse them

Slot

#240

Commission

20%

Nominators

504

Stake

59.0K KSM

Updated

1h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Active Set Longevity

366 days

100.0% uptime (366 of 366 observed days)

Current streak: 366 days

Longest streak: 366 days

Commission Stability

98/100

Excellent

Change frequency: 0 per 90 days

Volatility: 1.1%

Last changed: 2025-08-01 00:11:33

Expected Returns Details

12.2% ↘

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 8.2%

Trend: declining

Avg era reward: 895 KSM

Avg assigned stake: 13,119 KSM

Avg era point share: 0.14%

Based on 85 eras

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

0 KSM

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

17.8 KSM

Total income · 2026-07

● Comm 17.8 ● Self 0.0

Rewards distributed: 89 KSM

vs last month: ↗ +328.8%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Medium

Avg slot: 256.5 (30 days)

90-day avg: 339.7

180-day avg: 379.3

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

❌ 19 eras overdue

Overdue (affects health score)

Total unclaimed: 23/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

4/10

Moderate

Health Score: 62.81/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

0/10

No risks detected

✓ No risk flags

⚠️ Unpaid Rewards: 19 eras overdue

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 9796 Details

A+

MVR: 0.37% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

89/100

Excellent

Stable nominators: 434

Unstable nominators: 39

Total nominators: 504

Stable percentage: 86.1%

Active Set Risk Details

0/10

Low risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 36.4% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #240 → #340 (still safe)

Risk: LOW

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 29.3% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: LOW

Node Telemetry

Stakeflow

Parity Polkadot 1.22.4

Peers: 21

Propagation: 269ms

Last snapshot: 2026-07-11 04:34:02

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 4/10 risk = 10 - (62.81/10)

Health Score Breakdown (62.81/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 26.55/30

Longevity: 15.0/15 pts
366 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 9.8/10 pts
No commission changes (10 pts)
Slot Volatility: 1.8/5 pts
StdDev 65.1 → 1.7 pts (Moderate volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 4.98/33

Era Points Consistency: 0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 10.0/10 pts
Grade A+ = 10.0 pts
MVR: 5.0/5 pts
0.37% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -10.0 pts penalty
-10.0 pts penalty (19 overdue eras past grace period)

3. Growth (20 points) 8.24/20

APY Relative Score: 3.2/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 25.0/32

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: Stakeflow
Commission Transparency: 5.0/5 pts
No commission changes for 180+ days
Grade Trend: 3.0/5 pts
Grade stable (3 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 5.0/5 pts
Public telemetry available (5 pts)
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 14.92/20

Nominator Stability: 8.9/10 pts
86.1% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 2.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 100 slots
Aggregate Risk: 4.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 40 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Poland
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 7.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
1.22.4-82af15d17fd = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 3.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 92.69/146

Normalized Health Score: 62.81/100

Risk Score: 4/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

EXCELLENT

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

434

86.1%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

11%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

434 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

39 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

86.1% Stable 11% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Low Risk: You have an excellent stable nominator base. 86.1% of your nominators have been with you for 90+ days, indicating strong commitment and trust. This stability provides a strong foundation for maintaining your active set position.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

0/10

LOW RISK

Current Position

#240

in active set

Safety Buffer

360

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

36.4%

of your stake

→

New Position

#340

▼ 100 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

Still Safe - Would remain well within active set with 360 slot buffer

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 29.3%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 36.4%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income

Stakeflow ✓ Reasonable Fair Poland, Warsaw

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Health Score Breakdown (62.81/100)

💰 Reward Claims Status

Current Status

Last 30 Eras Timeline

Payment Speed

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

Current Risk Level

How to Improve Nominator Stability

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

Recent Nominator Behavior

How to Reduce Risk