SAXEMBERG/SAXEMBERG 3 - Kusama Validator Performance

SAXEMBERG/SAXEMBERG 3 ✓ Reasonable Fair

Lithuania, Vilnius

Part of SAXEMBERG cluster - 3 validators · 0.43% of active set · Manage this fleet →

Backed by 7 nomination pools · browse them

Slot

#341

Commission

20%

Nominators

203

Stake

78.0K KSM

Updated

10h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Active Set Longevity

332 days

100.0% uptime (332 of 332 observed days)

Current streak: 332 days

Longest streak: 332 days

Commission Stability

94/100

Excellent

Change frequency: 0 per 90 days

Volatility: 2.5%

Last changed: 2026-04-22 11:10:12

Expected Returns Details

11.9% ↗

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 5.8%

Trend: improving

Avg era reward: 922 KSM

Avg assigned stake: 13,787 KSM

Avg era point share: 0.14%

Based on 85 eras

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

3 KSM

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

16.7 KSM

Total income · 2026-10

● Comm 16.7 ● Self 0.0

Rewards distributed: 84 KSM

vs last month: ↗ +191.7%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Low

Avg slot: 292.2 (30 days)

90-day avg: 272.4

180-day avg: 233.4

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

✅ All rewards claimed

Total unclaimed: 0/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

5/10

Moderate

Health Score: 54.93/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

0/10

No risks detected

✓ No risk flags

⚠️ Unpaid Rewards: 0 eras overdue

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 10154 Details

MVR: 1.92% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

54/100

Moderate

Stable nominators: 79

Unstable nominators: 62

Total nominators: 203

Stable percentage: 38.9%

Active Set Risk Details

3/10

Low risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 51.3% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #341 → #541 (moderate buffer)

Risk: MODERATE

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 33.2% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: LOW

Node DHT

Saxemberg3

Parity Polkadot v1.22.2

Network: litep2p

IPv6: ✓ Supported

Multi-homed: ✓ Yes

Source: DHT discovery (telemetry not available)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 5/10 risk = 10 - (54.93/10)

Health Score Breakdown (54.93/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 27.64/30

Longevity: 15.0/15 pts
332 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 9.4/10 pts
No commission changes (10 pts)
Slot Volatility: 3.2/5 pts
StdDev 35.3 → 3.2 pts (Low volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 12.9/33

Era Points Consistency: 0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 8.0/10 pts
Grade A = 8.0 pts
MVR: 4.9/5 pts
1.92% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -0.0 pts penalty
No unclaimed eras

3. Growth (20 points) 8.21/20

APY Relative Score: 3.2/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 12.0/32

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: SAXEMBERG/SAXEMBERG 3
Commission Transparency: 0.0/5 pts
No commission changes for 180+ days
Grade Trend: 0.0/5 pts
Grade declined (0 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
No public telemetry
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 7.42/20

Nominator Stability: 5.4/10 pts
38.9% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 0.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 200 slots
Aggregate Risk: 2.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 80 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Lithuania
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 7.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
v1.22.2-c112e83f4f6 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 3.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 81.17/146

Normalized Health Score: 54.93/100

Risk Score: 5/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

MODERATE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

38.9%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

46%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

79 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

62 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

38.9% Stable 46% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Moderate Risk: Your nominator base has moderate stability. While 79 nominators have been with you long-term, 62 are relatively new (<90 days). Focus on building relationships with your newer nominators to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

3/10

LOW RISK

Current Position

#341

in active set

Safety Buffer

159

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

51.3%

of your stake

→

New Position

#541

▼ 200 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

Moderate Buffer - Would remain in active set but closer to the edge (159 slot buffer)

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 33.2%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 51.3%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income

SAXEMBERG/SAXEMBERG 3 ✓ Reasonable Fair Lithuania, Vilnius