SAXEMBERG/SAXEMBERG 3 - Kusama Validator Performance

SAXEMBERG/SAXEMBERG 3 ✓ Reasonable Fair

Lithuania, Vilnius

Part of SAXEMBERG cluster - 3 validators · 0.43% of active set · Manage this fleet →

Backed by 7 nomination pools · browse them

Slot

#255

Commission

20%

Nominators

212

Stake

87.1K KSM

Updated

6h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Active Set Longevity

365 days

100.0% uptime (365 of 365 observed days)

Current streak: 365 days

Longest streak: 365 days

Commission Stability

70/100

Moderate

Change frequency: 1 per 90 days

Volatility: 2.1%

Last changed: 2026-04-22 11:10:12

Expected Returns Details

11.8% ↗

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 11.6%

Trend: improving

Avg era reward: 895 KSM

Avg assigned stake: 12,706 KSM

Avg era point share: 0.14%

Based on 85 eras

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

3 KSM

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

16.9 KSM

Total income · 2026-07

● Comm 16.9 ● Self 0.0

Rewards distributed: 84 KSM

vs last month: ↗ +348.9%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Medium

Avg slot: 259.3 (30 days)

90-day avg: 194.4

180-day avg: 159.9

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

✅ All rewards claimed

Total unclaimed: 0/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

4/10

Moderate

Health Score: 57.6/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

0/10

No risks detected

✓ No risk flags

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 9794 Details

A+

MVR: 0.0% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

46/100

Unstable

Stable nominators: 89

Unstable nominators: 104

Total nominators: 212

Stable percentage: 42.0%

Active Set Risk Details

0/10

Low risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 19.5% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #255 → #305 (still safe)

Risk: LOW

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 83.4% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: LOW

Node DHT

Saxemberg3

Parity Polkadot v1.22.2

Network: litep2p

IPv6: ✓ Supported

Multi-homed: ✓ Yes

Source: DHT discovery (telemetry not available)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 4/10 risk = 10 - (57.6/10)

Health Score Breakdown (57.6/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 23.56/30

Longevity: 15.0/15 pts
365 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 7.0/10 pts
1 commission changes over 180 days
Slot Volatility: 1.6/5 pts
StdDev 69.0 → 1.5 pts (Moderate volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 15.0/33

Era Points Consistency: 0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 10.0/10 pts
Grade A+ = 10.0 pts
MVR: 5.0/5 pts
0.00% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -0.0 pts penalty
No unclaimed eras

3. Growth (20 points) 7.89/20

APY Relative Score: 2.9/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 17.0/32

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: SAXEMBERG/SAXEMBERG 3
Commission Transparency: 0.0/5 pts
1 commission changes in 180 days (0 pts)
Grade Trend: 5.0/5 pts
Grade improved (5 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
No public telemetry
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 8.65/20

Nominator Stability: 4.7/10 pts
42.0% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 4.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 50 slots
Aggregate Risk: 0.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 150 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Lithuania
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 7.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
v1.22.2-c112e83f4f6 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 3.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 85.10/146

Normalized Health Score: 57.6/100

Risk Score: 4/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

UNSTABLE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

42.0%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

104

54%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

89 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

104 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

42.0% Stable 54% Unstable

Current Risk Level

High Risk: Your nominator base is unstable with frequent turnover. Only 42.0% of nominators have been with you for 90+ days. This puts you at risk of sudden stake losses that could drop you from the active set. Immediate action needed to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators
Focus on retention: You have more new nominators than stable ones. Prioritize keeping your current nominators happy

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

0/10

LOW RISK

Current Position

#255

in active set

Safety Buffer

395

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

19.5%

of your stake

→

New Position

#305

▼ 50 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

Still Safe - Would remain well within active set with 395 slot buffer

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 83.4%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 19.5%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income

SAXEMBERG/SAXEMBERG 3 ✓ Reasonable Fair Lithuania, Vilnius

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Health Score Breakdown (57.6/100)

💰 Reward Claims Status

Current Status

Last 30 Eras Timeline

Payment Speed

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

Current Risk Level

How to Improve Nominator Stability

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

Recent Nominator Behavior

How to Reduce Risk