SAXEMBERG/SAXEMBERG 3 - Kusama Validator Performance

SAXEMBERG/SAXEMBERG 3 ✓ Reasonable Fair

Lithuania, Vilnius

Part of SAXEMBERG cluster - 3 validators · 0.43% of active set · Manage this fleet →

Backed by 7 nomination pools · browse them

Slot

#271

Commission

20%

Nominators

210

Stake

108.1K KSM

Updated

9h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Active Set Longevity

365 days

100.0% uptime (365 of 365 observed days)

Current streak: 365 days

Longest streak: 365 days

Commission Stability

87/100

Excellent

Change frequency: 0 per 90 days

Volatility: 2.4%

Last changed: 2026-04-22 11:10:12

Expected Returns Details

11.9% ↘

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 4.8%

Trend: declining

Avg era reward: 919 KSM

Avg assigned stake: 13,779 KSM

Avg era point share: 0.14%

Based on 85 eras

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

3 KSM

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

0.1 KSM

Total income · 2026-09

● Comm 0.1 ● Self 0.0

Rewards distributed: 1 KSM

vs last month: ↘ -99.5%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Medium

Avg slot: 258.4 (30 days)

90-day avg: 245.4

180-day avg: 193.4

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

✅ All rewards claimed

Total unclaimed: 0/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

5/10

Moderate

Health Score: 51.36/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

2/10

Low risk

⚠ Low era points

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 9974 Details

MVR: 57.86% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

58/100

Moderate

Stable nominators: 58

Unstable nominators: 21

Total nominators: 210

Stable percentage: 27.6%

Active Set Risk Details

0/10

Low risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 37.0% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #271 → #371 (still safe)

Risk: LOW

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 44.5% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: LOW

Node DHT

Saxemberg3

Parity Polkadot v1.22.2

Network: litep2p

IPv6: ✓ Supported

Multi-homed: ✓ Yes

Source: DHT discovery (telemetry not available)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 5/10 risk = 10 - (51.36/10)

Health Score Breakdown (51.36/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 25.95/30

Longevity: 15.0/15 pts
365 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 8.7/10 pts
No commission changes (10 pts)
Slot Volatility: 2.2/5 pts
StdDev 55.1 → 2.2 pts (Moderate volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 6.11/33

Era Points Consistency: 0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 4.0/10 pts
Grade C = 4.0 pts
MVR: 2.1/5 pts
57.86% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -0.0 pts penalty
No unclaimed eras

3. Growth (20 points) 8.21/20

APY Relative Score: 3.2/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 12.0/32

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: SAXEMBERG/SAXEMBERG 3
Commission Transparency: 0.0/5 pts
No commission changes for 180+ days
Grade Trend: 0.0/5 pts
Grade declined (0 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
No public telemetry
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 9.88/20

Nominator Stability: 5.9/10 pts
27.6% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 2.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 100 slots
Aggregate Risk: 2.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 80 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Lithuania
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 7.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
v1.22.2-c112e83f4f6 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 3.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 75.15/146

Normalized Health Score: 51.36/100

Risk Score: 5/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

MODERATE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

27.6%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

42%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

58 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

21 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

27.6% Stable 42% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Moderate Risk: Your nominator base has moderate stability. While 58 nominators have been with you long-term, 21 are relatively new (<90 days). Focus on building relationships with your newer nominators to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

0/10

LOW RISK

Current Position

#271

in active set

Safety Buffer

329

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

37.0%

of your stake

→

New Position

#371

▼ 100 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

Still Safe - Would remain well within active set with 329 slot buffer

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 44.5%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 37.0%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income

SAXEMBERG/SAXEMBERG 3 ✓ Reasonable Fair Lithuania, Vilnius