Stakeflow/2 - Kusama Validator Performance

Stakeflow/2 ✓ Reasonable Fair

Poland, Warsaw (MEVSPACE sp. z o.o.)

Part of STAKEFLOW cluster - 2 validators · 0.29% of active set · Manage this fleet →

Slot

#698

Commission

20%

Nominators

271

Stake

33.4K KSM

Updated

10h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Active Set Longevity

259 days

71.0% uptime (259 of 365 observed days)

Current streak: 56 days

Longest streak: 93 days

Commission Stability

100/100

Excellent

Change frequency: 0 per 90 days

Volatility: 0.0%

Expected Returns Details

12.3% →

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 8.9%

Trend: stable

Avg era reward: 919 KSM

Avg assigned stake: 13,740 KSM

Avg era point share: 0.15%

Based on 85 eras

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

0 KSM

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

0.2 KSM

Total income · 2026-09

● Comm 0.2 ● Self 0.0

Rewards distributed: 1 KSM

vs last month: ↘ -99.1%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Low

Avg slot: 632.7 (30 days)

90-day avg: 664.3

180-day avg: 702.9

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

❌ 13 eras overdue

Overdue (affects health score)

Total unclaimed: 16/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

4/10

Moderate

Health Score: 64.54/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

2/10

Low risk

⚠ Threshold risk

⚠️ Unpaid Rewards: 13 eras overdue

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 9974 Details

A+

MVR: 0.0% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

88/100

Excellent

Stable nominators: 219

Unstable nominators: 9

Total nominators: 271

Stable percentage: 80.8%

Active Set Risk Details

10/10

High risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 40.5% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #698 → #798 (would drop out!)

Risk: CRITICAL

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 8.0% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: CRITICAL

Node Telemetry

Stakeflow/2

Parity Polkadot 1.24.1

Peers: 24

Propagation: 360ms

Last snapshot: 2026-09-01 04:34:02

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 4/10 risk = 10 - (64.54/10)

Health Score Breakdown (64.54/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 23.69/30

Longevity: 10.6/15 pts
259 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 10.0/10 pts
No commission changes (10 pts)
Slot Volatility: 3.0/5 pts
StdDev 38.9 → 3.1 pts (Low volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 5.0/33

Era Points Consistency: 0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 10.0/10 pts
Grade A+ = 10.0 pts
MVR: 5.0/5 pts
0.00% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -10.0 pts penalty
-10.0 pts penalty (13 overdue eras past grace period)

3. Growth (20 points) 8.66/20

APY Relative Score: 3.7/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 25.0/32

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: Stakeflow/2
Commission Transparency: 5.0/5 pts
No commission changes for 180+ days
Grade Trend: 3.0/5 pts
Grade stable (3 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 5.0/5 pts
Public telemetry available (5 pts)
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 15.88/20

Nominator Stability: 8.9/10 pts
80.8% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 2.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 100 slots
Aggregate Risk: 5.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 10 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Poland
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 8.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
1.24.1-8ae9775dc43 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 4.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 92.23/146

Normalized Health Score: 64.54/100

Risk Score: 4/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

EXCELLENT

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

219

80.8%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

12%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

219 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

9 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

80.8% Stable 12% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Low Risk: You have an excellent stable nominator base. 80.8% of your nominators have been with you for 90+ days, indicating strong commitment and trust. This stability provides a strong foundation for maintaining your active set position.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

10/10

HIGH RISK

Current Position

#698

in active set

Safety Buffer

-98

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

40.5%

of your stake

→

New Position

#798

▼ 100 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

WOULD DROP OUT! - Loss of this nominator would kick you out of the active set

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 8.0%

What This Means:

Some Turnover - Moderate amount of recent switchers. These nominators may be less committed and could leave for other validators

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 40.5%)
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income
URGENT: Your buffer is critically low. Focus on attracting new nominators immediately

Stakeflow/2 ✓ Reasonable Fair Poland, Warsaw (MEVSPACE sp. z o.o.)