CS_Axial - Kusama Validator Performance

CS_Axial ✓ Reasonable Poor

Poland, Warsaw (MEVSPACE sp. z o.o.)

Slot

#755

Commission

15%

Nominators

2088

Stake

70.9K KSM

Updated

6h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Poor)

Active Set Longevity

173 days

47.4% uptime (173 of 365 observed days)

Current streak: 0 days

Longest streak: 131 days

Commission Stability

99/100

Excellent

Change frequency: 0 per 90 days

Volatility: 0.3%

Last changed: 2025-11-18 11:11:23

Expected Returns Details

8.1% ↘

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 0.0%

Trend: declining

Avg era reward: 893 KSM

Avg assigned stake: 12,379 KSM

Avg era point share: 0.08%

Based on 51 eras

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

1 KSM

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

3.2 KSM

Total income · 2026-07

● Comm 3.2 ● Self 0.0

Rewards distributed: 22 KSM

vs last month: ↗ +34.1%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

High

Avg slot: 694.6 (30 days)

90-day avg: 598.0

180-day avg: 515.5

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

⚠️ 1 era overdue

Overdue (affects health score)

Total unclaimed: 1/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

5/10

Moderate

Health Score: 48.85/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

5/10

Moderate risk

⚠ Threshold risk

⚠ Low grade

⚠️ Unpaid Rewards: 1 era overdue

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 9794 Details

MVR: 100.0% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

95/100

Excellent

Stable nominators: 1988

Unstable nominators: 85

Total nominators: 2088

Stable percentage: 95.2%

Active Set Risk Details

10/10

High risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 5.6% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #755 → #765 (would drop out!)

Risk: CRITICAL

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 43.1% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: CRITICAL

Node Telemetry

CS_Axial

Parity Polkadot 1.22.3

Peers: 29

Propagation: 853ms

Last snapshot: 2026-07-01 04:34:02

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 5/10 risk = 10 - (48.85/10)

Health Score Breakdown (48.85/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 17.01/30

Longevity: 7.1/15 pts
173 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 9.9/10 pts
No commission changes (10 pts)
Slot Volatility: 0/5 pts
StdDev 134.3 → 0.0 pts (High volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) -2.0/33

Era Points Consistency: 0.0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 0.0/10 pts
Grade F = 0.0 pts
MVR: 0.0/5 pts
100.00% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -2.0 pts penalty
-2.0 pts penalty (1 overdue eras past grace period)

3. Growth (20 points) 6.75/20

APY Relative Score: 1.8/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 17.0/32

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: CS_Axial
Commission Transparency: 5.0/5 pts
No commission changes for 180+ days
Grade Trend: 0.0/5 pts
Grade declined (0 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
Public telemetry available (5 pts)
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 16.56/20

Nominator Stability: 9.6/10 pts
95.2% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 5.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 10 slots
Aggregate Risk: 2.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 80 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Poland
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 8.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
1.22.3-c112e83f4f6 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 4.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 69.32/146

Normalized Health Score: 48.85/100

Risk Score: 5/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

EXCELLENT

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

1988

95.2%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

1988 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

85 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

95.2% Stable 5% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Low Risk: You have an excellent stable nominator base. 95.2% of your nominators have been with you for 90+ days, indicating strong commitment and trust. This stability provides a strong foundation for maintaining your active set position.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

10/10

HIGH RISK

Current Position

#755

in active set

Safety Buffer

-65

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

5.6%

of your stake

→

New Position

#765

▼ 10 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

WOULD DROP OUT! - Loss of this nominator would kick you out of the active set

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 43.1%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income
URGENT: Your buffer is critically low. Focus on attracting new nominators immediately

CS_Axial ✓ Reasonable Poor Poland, Warsaw (MEVSPACE sp. z o.o.)