DAhGPm...J582NSyS - Kusama Validator Performance

DAhGPm...J582NSyS Poor

Sweden, Stockholm (Amazon.com, Inc.)

Slot

#537

Commission

15%

Nominators

Stake

160.4K KSM

Updated

56m ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Poor)

Active Set Longevity

285 days

77.9% uptime (285 of 366 observed days)

Current streak: 1 days

Longest streak: 77 days

Commission Stability

100/100

Excellent

Change frequency: 0 per 90 days

Volatility: 0.0%

Expected Returns Details

Not in active set — last active era 9949 (39 eras ago)

16.5% →

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Last active-era rate (era 9949): 25.2%

Trend: stable

Avg era reward: 919 KSM

Avg assigned stake: 11,760 KSM

Avg era point share: 0.16%

Based on 25 eras

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

0 KSM

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

5.4 KSM

Total income · 2026-08

● Comm 5.4 ● Self 0.0

Rewards distributed: 36 KSM

vs last month: -

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

High

Avg slot: 614.7 (30 days)

90-day avg: 538.9

180-day avg: 584.0

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

⚠️ 1 era overdue

Overdue (affects health score)

Total unclaimed: 1/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

6/10

Moderate

Health Score: 44.3/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

2/10

Low risk

⚠ Low era points

⚠️ Unpaid Rewards: 1 era overdue

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 9949 Details

A+

MVR: 0.48% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

73/100

Moderate

Stable nominators: 13

Unstable nominators: 4

Total nominators: 19

Stable percentage: 68.4%

Active Set Risk Details

6/10

Moderate risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 38.1% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #537 → #637 (close to edge)

Risk: HIGH

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 96.9% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: HIGH

Node DHT

staked-eu-north-1-496-a

Parity Polkadot v1.21.3

Network: litep2p

IPv6: ✓ Supported

Multi-homed: ✓ Yes

Source: DHT discovery (telemetry not available)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 6/10 risk = 10 - (44.3/10)

Health Score Breakdown (44.3/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 21.68/30

Longevity: 11.7/15 pts
285 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 10.0/10 pts
No commission changes (10 pts)
Slot Volatility: 0/5 pts
StdDev 183.7 → 0.0 pts (High volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 12.98/33

Era Points Consistency: 0.0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 10.0/10 pts
Grade A+ = 10.0 pts
MVR: 5.0/5 pts
0.48% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -2.0 pts penalty
-2.0 pts penalty (1 overdue eras past grace period)

3. Growth (20 points) 14.12/20

APY Relative Score: 9.1/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 5.0/32

Identity Completeness: 0.0/12 pts
No on-chain identity
Commission Transparency: 5.0/5 pts
No commission changes for 180+ days
Grade Trend: 0.0/5 pts
Grade declined (0 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
No public telemetry
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 9.37/20

Nominator Stability: 7.4/10 pts
68.4% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 2.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 100 slots
Aggregate Risk: 0.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 150 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Sweden
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 7.5/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
v1.21.3-47f1ee9e527 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 3.5/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 76.65/146

Normalized Health Score: 44.3/100

Risk Score: 6/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

MODERATE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

68.4%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

27%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

13 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

4 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

68.4% Stable 27% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Moderate Risk: Your nominator base has moderate stability. While 13 nominators have been with you long-term, 4 are relatively new (<90 days). Focus on building relationships with your newer nominators to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

6/10

MODERATE RISK

Current Position

#537

in active set

Safety Buffer

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

38.1%

of your stake

→

New Position

#637

▼ 100 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

Close to Edge - Only 63 slots from dropping out - very risky!

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 96.9%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 38.1%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income
URGENT: Your buffer is critically low. Focus on attracting new nominators immediately

DAhGPm...J582NSyS Poor Sweden, Stockholm (Amazon.com, Inc.)

Performance Metrics (Health: Poor)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Health Score Breakdown (44.3/100)

💰 Reward Claims Status

Current Status

Last 30 Eras Timeline

Payment Speed

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

Current Risk Level

How to Improve Nominator Stability

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

Recent Nominator Behavior

How to Reduce Risk