Cstdw8...msk57W72 - Kusama Validator Performance

Cstdw8...msk57W72 Poor

Germany, Frankfurt am Main (Fornex Hosting S.L.)

Backed by 1 nomination pool · browse them

Slot

#104

Commission

30%

Nominators

Stake

259.3K KSM

Updated

13h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Poor)

Active Set Longevity

32 days

9.6% uptime (32 of 332 observed days)

Current streak: 32 days

Longest streak: 32 days

Commission Stability

78/100

Moderate

Change frequency: 0 per 90 days

Volatility: 4.6%

Last changed: 2026-04-02 22:10:06

Expected Returns Details

12.2% ↗

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 19.3%

Trend: improving

Avg era reward: 895 KSM

Avg assigned stake: 11,602 KSM

Avg era point share: 0.15%

Based on 85 eras

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

0 KSM

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

27.6 KSM

Total income · 2026-07

● Comm 27.6 ● Self 0.0

Rewards distributed: 92 KSM

vs last month: ↗ +388.0%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

High

Avg slot: 103.5 (30 days)

90-day avg: 691.2

180-day avg: 846.0

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

⚠️ 1 era overdue

Overdue (affects health score)

Total unclaimed: 1/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

5/10

Moderate

Health Score: 49.29/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

0/10

No risks detected

✓ No risk flags

⚠️ Unpaid Rewards: 1 era overdue

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 9794 Details

A+

MVR: 0.0% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

83/100

Excellent

Stable nominators: 2

Unstable nominators: 0

Total nominators: 3

Stable percentage: 66.7%

Active Set Risk Details

0/10

Low risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 53.7% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #104 → #304 (still safe)

Risk: LOW

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 32.2% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: LOW

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 5/10 risk = 10 - (49.29/10)

Health Score Breakdown (49.29/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 9.25/30

Longevity: 1.4/15 pts
32 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 7.8/10 pts
No commission changes (10 pts)
Slot Volatility: 0/5 pts
StdDev 424.5 → 0.0 pts (High volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 13.0/33

Era Points Consistency: 0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 10.0/10 pts
Grade A+ = 10.0 pts
MVR: 5.0/5 pts
0.00% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -2.0 pts penalty
-2.0 pts penalty (1 overdue eras past grace period)

3. Growth (20 points) 8.39/20

APY Relative Score: 3.4/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 17.0/32

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: Cstdw8...msk57W72
Commission Transparency: 0.0/5 pts
No commission changes for 180+ days
Grade Trend: 5.0/5 pts
Grade improved (5 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
No public telemetry
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 10.33/20

Nominator Stability: 8.3/10 pts
66.7% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 0.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 200 slots
Aggregate Risk: 2.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 80 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Germany
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 4.0/8

Client Version: 0.0/4 pts
Unknown (neutral 2pts)
Location Quality: 4.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 67.97/146

Normalized Health Score: 49.29/100

Risk Score: 5/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

EXCELLENT

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

66.7%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

17%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

2 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

0 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

66.7% Stable 17% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Low Risk: You have an excellent stable nominator base. 66.7% of your nominators have been with you for 90+ days, indicating strong commitment and trust. This stability provides a strong foundation for maintaining your active set position.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

0/10

LOW RISK

Current Position

#104

in active set

Safety Buffer

396

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

53.7%

of your stake

→

New Position

#304

▼ 200 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

Still Safe - Would remain well within active set with 396 slot buffer

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 32.2%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 53.7%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income

Cstdw8...msk57W72 Poor Germany, Frankfurt am Main (Fornex Hosting S.L.)

Performance Metrics (Health: Poor)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Health Score Breakdown (49.29/100)

💰 Reward Claims Status

Current Status

Last 30 Eras Timeline

Payment Speed

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

Current Risk Level

How to Improve Nominator Stability

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

Recent Nominator Behavior

How to Reduce Risk