CibcGc...9JeWCcQs - Kusama Validator Performance

CibcGc...9JeWCcQs ✓ Reasonable Poor

United States, Manassas (Leaseweb USA, Inc.)

Backed by 1 nomination pool · browse them

Slot

#788

Commission

100%

Nominators

146

Stake

32.3K KSM

Updated

13h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Poor)

Active Set Longevity

153 days

41.9% uptime (153 of 365 observed days)

Current streak: 0 days

Longest streak: 127 days

Commission Stability

47/100

Unstable

Change frequency: 1 per 90 days

Volatility: 25.2%

Last changed: 2026-06-06 22:10:13

Expected Returns Details

Not in active set — last active era 9713 (81 eras ago)

0.0% →

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Last active-era rate (era 9713): 0.0%

Trend: stable

Avg era reward: 901 KSM

Avg assigned stake: 7,828 KSM

Avg era point share: 0.08%

Based on 4 eras

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

1 KSM

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

2.9 KSM

Total income · 2026-06

● Comm 2.9 ● Self 0.0

Rewards distributed: 3 KSM

vs last month: ↗ +1021.2%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

High

Avg slot: 822.6 (30 days)

90-day avg: 874.1

180-day avg: 901.8

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

❌ 7 eras overdue

Overdue (affects health score)

Total unclaimed: 7/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

7/10

High

Health Score: 30.46/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

7/10

High risk

⚠ 100% commission

⚠ Threshold risk

⚠️ Unpaid Rewards: 7 eras overdue

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 9713 Details

B+

MVR: 13.52% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

29/100

Unstable

Stable nominators: 26

Unstable nominators: 85

Total nominators: 146

Stable percentage: 17.8%

Active Set Risk Details

10/10

High risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 11.1% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #788 → #798 (would drop out!)

Risk: CRITICAL

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 79.1% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: CRITICAL

Node Telemetry

stakeplus-bm1-1-2

Parity Polkadot 1.22.1

Peers: 38

Propagation: 439ms

Last snapshot: 2026-06-01 04:34:01

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 7/10 risk = 10 - (30.46/10)

Health Score Breakdown (30.46/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 10.99/30

Longevity: 6.3/15 pts
153 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 4.7/10 pts
1 commission changes over 180 days
Slot Volatility: 0/5 pts
StdDev 124.4 → 0.0 pts (High volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) -5.68/33

Era Points Consistency: 0.0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 0.0/10 pts
No Turboflakes grade
MVR: 4.3/5 pts
13.52% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -10.0 pts penalty
-10.0 pts penalty (7 overdue eras past grace period)

3. Growth (20 points) 5.0/20

APY Relative Score: 0.0/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 12.0/32

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: CibcGc...9JeWCcQs
Commission Transparency: 0.0/5 pts
1 commission changes in 180 days (0 pts)
Grade Trend: 0.0/5 pts
Grade declined (0 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
Public telemetry available (5 pts)
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 7.98/20

Nominator Stability: 3.0/10 pts
17.8% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 5.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 10 slots
Aggregate Risk: 0.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 150 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: United States
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 8.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
1.22.1-f8cfbb96055 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 4.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 44.29/146

Normalized Health Score: 30.46/100

Risk Score: 7/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

UNSTABLE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

17.8%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

71%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

26 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

85 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

17.8% Stable 71% Unstable

Current Risk Level

High Risk: Your nominator base is unstable with frequent turnover. Only 17.8% of nominators have been with you for 90+ days. This puts you at risk of sudden stake losses that could drop you from the active set. Immediate action needed to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators
Focus on retention: You have more new nominators than stable ones. Prioritize keeping your current nominators happy

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

10/10

HIGH RISK

Current Position

#788

in active set

Safety Buffer

-98

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

11.1%

of your stake

→

New Position

#798

▼ 10 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

WOULD DROP OUT! - Loss of this nominator would kick you out of the active set

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 79.1%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income
URGENT: Your buffer is critically low. Focus on attracting new nominators immediately

CibcGc...9JeWCcQs ✓ Reasonable Poor United States, Manassas (Leaseweb USA, Inc.)