P2P.ORG/10 - Kusama Validator Performance

P2P.ORG/10 ✓ Reasonable Poor

Netherlands (Kingdom of the), Amsterdam

Part of P2PORG cluster - 17 validators · 2.43% of active set · Manage this fleet →

Backed by 1 nomination pool · browse them

Slot

#788

Commission

30%

Nominators

214

Stake

29.7K KSM

Updated

10h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Poor)

Active Set Longevity

93 days

25.5% uptime (93 of 365 observed days)

Current streak: 0 days

Longest streak: 78 days

Commission Stability

84/100

Excellent

Change frequency: 0 per 90 days

Volatility: 5.8%

Last changed: 2026-04-02 22:10:06

Expected Returns

N/A

Awaiting data collection

Validator Self-Stake

6 KSM

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

0.3 KSM

Total income · 2026-07

● Comm 0.3 ● Self 0.0

Rewards distributed: 1 KSM

vs last month: ↘ -53.4%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Medium

Avg slot: 758.9 (30 days)

90-day avg: 786.0

180-day avg: 874.4

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

⚠️ 1 era overdue

Overdue (affects health score)

Total unclaimed: 1/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

6/10

Moderate

Health Score: 44.33/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

3/10

Low risk

⚠ Threshold risk

⚠️ Unpaid Rewards: 1 era overdue

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 9818 Details

MVR: 2.94% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

80/100

Excellent

Stable nominators: 144

Unstable nominators: 14

Total nominators: 214

Stable percentage: 67.3%

Active Set Risk Details

10/10

High risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 24.9% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #788 → #838 (would drop out!)

Risk: CRITICAL

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 18.8% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: CRITICAL

Node DHT

scm-fra1-kusama-validator-67-0

Parity Polkadot v1.22.1

Network: litep2p

IPv6: -

Multi-homed: ✓ Yes

Source: DHT discovery (telemetry not available)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 6/10 risk = 10 - (44.33/10)

Health Score Breakdown (44.33/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 14.18/30

Longevity: 3.8/15 pts
93 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 8.4/10 pts
No commission changes (10 pts)
Slot Volatility: 2.0/5 pts
StdDev 60.9 → 2.0 pts (Moderate volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 10.85/33

Era Points Consistency: 0.0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 8.0/10 pts
Grade A = 8.0 pts
MVR: 4.8/5 pts
2.94% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -2.0 pts penalty
-2.0 pts penalty (1 overdue eras past grace period)

3. Growth (20 points) 10.0/20

APY Relative Score: 5.0/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 12.0/32

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: P2P.ORG/10
Commission Transparency: 0.0/5 pts
No commission changes for 180+ days
Grade Trend: 0.0/5 pts
Grade declined (0 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 0.0/5 pts
No public telemetry
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 16.04/20

Nominator Stability: 8.0/10 pts
67.3% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 4.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 50 slots
Aggregate Risk: 4.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 40 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 7.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
v1.22.1-f8cfbb96055 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 3.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 76.07/146

Normalized Health Score: 44.33/100

Risk Score: 6/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

EXCELLENT

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

144

67.3%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

20%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

144 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

14 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

67.3% Stable 20% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Low Risk: You have an excellent stable nominator base. 67.3% of your nominators have been with you for 90+ days, indicating strong commitment and trust. This stability provides a strong foundation for maintaining your active set position.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

10/10

HIGH RISK

Current Position

#788

in active set

Safety Buffer

-138

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

24.9%

of your stake

→

New Position

#838

▼ 50 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

WOULD DROP OUT! - Loss of this nominator would kick you out of the active set

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 18.8%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 24.9%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income
URGENT: Your buffer is critically low. Focus on attracting new nominators immediately

P2P.ORG/10 ✓ Reasonable Poor Netherlands (Kingdom of the), Amsterdam