ilgio - Kusama Validator Performance

ilgio ✓ Reasonable Poor

Italy, Capriolo (Airbeam S.r.l.)

Part of the ilgio fleet · 2 validators · See the fleet →

Backed by 1 nomination pool · browse them

Slot

#734

Commission

85%

Nominators

152

Stake

37.8K KSM

Updated

3h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Poor)

Active Set Longevity

216 days

59.0% uptime (216 of 366 observed days)

Current streak: 0 days

Longest streak: 85 days

Commission Stability

80/100

Excellent

Change frequency: 0 per 90 days

Volatility: 25.0%

Last changed: 2025-11-18 11:11:23

Expected Returns Details

Not in active set — last active era 9961 (15 eras ago)

2.1% →

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Last active-era rate (era 9961): 2.8%

Trend: stable

Avg era reward: 920 KSM

Avg assigned stake: 13,656 KSM

Avg era point share: 0.14%

Based on 23 eras

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

108 KSM

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

25.8 KSM

Total income · 2026-08

● Comm 25.8 ● Self 0.0

Rewards distributed: 30 KSM

vs last month: ↗ +3380.2%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Medium

Avg slot: 708.4 (30 days)

90-day avg: 706.3

180-day avg: 732.9

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

❌ 13 eras overdue

Overdue (affects health score)

Total unclaimed: 13/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

6/10

Moderate

Health Score: 43.43/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

5/10

Moderate risk

⚠ Threshold risk

⚠ Low era points

⚠️ Unpaid Rewards: 13 eras overdue

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 9961 Details

A+

MVR: 0.0% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

75/100

Moderate

Stable nominators: 98

Unstable nominators: 22

Total nominators: 152

Stable percentage: 64.5%

Active Set Risk Details

10/10

High risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 80.8% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #734 → #934 (would drop out!)

Risk: CRITICAL

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 93.9% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: CRITICAL

Node Telemetry

ilgio

Parity Polkadot 1.24.0

Peers: 37

Propagation: 259ms

Last snapshot: 2026-09-01 04:34:02

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 6/10 risk = 10 - (43.43/10)

Health Score Breakdown (43.43/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 19.04/30

Longevity: 8.8/15 pts
216 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 8.0/10 pts
No commission changes (10 pts)
Slot Volatility: 2.2/5 pts
StdDev 55.9 → 2.2 pts (Moderate volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 5.0/33

Era Points Consistency: 0.0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 10.0/10 pts
Grade A+ = 10.0 pts
MVR: 5.0/5 pts
0.00% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -10.0 pts penalty
-10.0 pts penalty (13 overdue eras past grace period)

3. Growth (20 points) 6.36/20

APY Relative Score: 1.4/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 22.0/32

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: ilgio
Commission Transparency: 5.0/5 pts
No commission changes for 180+ days
Grade Trend: 0.0/5 pts
Grade declined (0 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 5.0/5 pts
Public telemetry available (5 pts)
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 7.5/20

Nominator Stability: 7.5/10 pts
64.5% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 0.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 200 slots
Aggregate Risk: 0.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 150 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Italy
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 8.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
1.24.0-660acefe665 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 4.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 73.90/146

Normalized Health Score: 43.43/100

Risk Score: 6/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

MODERATE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

64.5%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

25%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

98 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

22 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

64.5% Stable 25% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Moderate Risk: Your nominator base has moderate stability. While 98 nominators have been with you long-term, 22 are relatively new (<90 days). Focus on building relationships with your newer nominators to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

10/10

HIGH RISK

Current Position

#734

in active set

Safety Buffer

-234

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

80.8%

of your stake

→

New Position

#934

▼ 200 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

WOULD DROP OUT! - Loss of this nominator would kick you out of the active set

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 93.9%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 80.8%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income
URGENT: Your buffer is critically low. Focus on attracting new nominators immediately

ilgio ✓ Reasonable Poor Italy, Capriolo (Airbeam S.r.l.)