🐟Bluefin Tuna🐟 - Kusama Validator Performance

🐟Bluefin Tuna🐟 ✓ Reasonable Fair

Poland, Warsaw (MEVSPACE sp. z o.o.)

Part of the 🐟Bluefin Tuna🐟 fleet · 5 validators · See the fleet →

Slot

#662

Commission

50%

Nominators

112

Stake

23.1K KSM

Updated

4h ago

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Active Set Longevity

107 days

32.1% uptime (107 of 333 observed days)

Current streak: 21 days

Longest streak: 52 days

Commission Stability

53/100

Moderate

Change frequency: 1 per 90 days

Volatility: 3.9%

Last changed: 2026-10-12 11:10:12

Expected Returns Details

9.9% ↘

Estimated APY (28-day avg)

Current era rate: 9.5%

Trend: declining

Avg era reward: 921 KSM

Avg assigned stake: 13,667 KSM

Avg era point share: 0.13%

Based on 61 eras

Click for trend, ranking, and projection

Validator Self-Stake

52 KSM

Bonded by validator

💰 Validator Earnings Details

15.6 KSM

Total income · 2026-10

● Comm 15.4 ● Self 0.2

Rewards distributed: 56 KSM

vs last month: ↗ +563.4%

Click for full earnings history →

Slot Position Volatility

Low

Avg slot: 682.3 (30 days)

90-day avg: 672.3

180-day avg: 743.6

💰 Reward Claims Status Details

✅ All rewards claimed

Total unclaimed: 0/84 eras

Click for timeline and details

Overall Risk (Health-Based) Details

4/10

Moderate

Health Score: 59.4/100

Used in main list "Risk Level" filter

Click for calculation details

Risk Assessment (Flags)

2/10

Low risk

⚠ Low era points

Based on specific warning indicators

Turboflakes Grade era 10156 Details

A+

MVR: 1.23% missed

Missed Vote Ratio (para consensus) · last completed era

Nominator Stability Details

73/100

Moderate

Stable nominators: 76

Unstable nominators: 24

Total nominators: 112

Stable percentage: 67.9%

Active Set Risk Details

10/10

High risk

Largest Nominator Risk:

⚠ 28.6% of stake from one nominator

If they leave: Slot #662 → #712 (would drop out!)

Risk: CRITICAL

Recent Nominator Changes:

⚠ 26.3% from recent switchers

Some recent nominator changes

Risk: CRITICAL

Node Telemetry

BlueFin_Tuna2 old

Parity Polkadot 1.24.0

Peers: 26

Propagation: 155ms

Last snapshot: 2026-10-11 04:34:02

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Risk Score (0-10) = 10 - (Health Score / 10)

Your validator: 4/10 risk = 10 - (59.4/10)

Health Score Breakdown (59.4/100)

The health score combines 7 dimensions into a comprehensive performance metric:

1. Stability (30 points) 13.33/30

Longevity: 4.8/15 pts
107 days in active set over last 365 days
Commission Stability: 5.3/10 pts
1 commission changes over 180 days
Slot Volatility: 3.2/5 pts
StdDev 34.0 → 3.3 pts (Low volatility)

2. Reliability (33 points) 14.94/33

Era Points Consistency: 0/15 pts
No era points data
Turboflakes Grade: 10.0/10 pts
Grade A+ = 10.0 pts
MVR: 4.9/5 pts
1.23% parachain votes missed
Payout Status: -0.0 pts penalty
No unclaimed eras

3. Growth (20 points) 7.1/20

APY Relative Score: 2.1/10 pts
Percentile-based APY score relative to active validators
Stake Growth: 5.0/10 pts
Placeholder while stake growth tracking is pending

4. Transparency (32 points) 20.0/32

Identity Completeness: 12.0/12 pts
Has on-chain identity: 🐟Bluefin Tuna🐟
Commission Transparency: 0.0/5 pts
1 commission changes in 180 days (0 pts)
Grade Trend: 3.0/5 pts
Grade stable (3 pts)
Telemetry Visibility: 5.0/5 pts
Public telemetry available (5 pts)
Self-Stake Confidence: 0.0/5 pts
Minimal self-stake (<1%)

5. Nominator Quality (20 points) 15.32/20

Nominator Stability: 7.3/10 pts
67.9% stable nominators (90+ days)
Single-Point-of-Failure: 4.0/5 pts
Biggest nominator impact: 50 slots
Aggregate Risk: 4.0/5 pts
Aggregate unstable risk: 40 slots

6. Geographic Diversity (8 points) 6.0/8

Location Transparency: 2.0/2 pts
Known location: Poland
Country Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low country concentration (<20%)
Provider Concentration: 2.0/2 pts
Low provider concentration (<15%)

7. Infrastructure (8 points) 8.0/8

Client Version: 4.0/4 pts
1.24.0-660acefe665 = Latest stable (4pts)
Location Quality: 4.0/4 pts
Based on Geographic Diversity (location visibility + concentration checks)

Total Points: 84.69/146

Normalized Health Score: 59.4/100

Risk Score: 4/10

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

STABILITY SCORE

MODERATE

STABLE (90+ DAYS)

67.9%

UNSTABLE (<90 DAYS)

27%

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Direct Impact on Your Position: Unstable nominators are more likely to switch validators, which can cause sudden drops in your backing and potentially push you out of the active set.

Health Score: Contributes 10 points to your overall health score under "Nominator Quality" dimension.

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

76 nominators

Supporting you for 90+ days

These are your committed, long-term supporters

24 nominators

Supporting you for <90 days

Recent additions - may still be testing validators

67.9% Stable 27% Unstable

Current Risk Level

Moderate Risk: Your nominator base has moderate stability. While 76 nominators have been with you long-term, 24 are relatively new (<90 days). Focus on building relationships with your newer nominators to improve retention.

How to Improve Nominator Stability

Build trust through consistency: Maintain high uptime, consistent era points, and stable commission rates
Engage with your community: Active presence on social media, Discord, or Telegram shows nominators you're committed
Demonstrate transparency: Share your infrastructure details, location, and operational practices
Optimize performance metrics: Higher era points and better grades attract quality, long-term nominators
Competitive but stable commission: Avoid frequent commission changes that can scare away nominators

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Overall Risk

10/10

HIGH RISK

Current Position

#662

in active set

Safety Buffer

-12

slots to edge

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

They Control

28.6%

of your stake

→

New Position

#712

▼ 50 slots drop

Impact Assessment:

WOULD DROP OUT! - Loss of this nominator would kick you out of the active set

Recent Nominator Behavior

Stake from Recent Switchers 26.3%

What This Means:

High Turnover - Large portion of stake from recent switchers. These nominators have shown they're willing to change validators and may leave again

How to Reduce Risk

Diversify your nominator base: Attract more nominators to reduce dependency on your largest backer (currently 28.6%)
Build nominator loyalty: Engage with your community, maintain consistent performance, and communicate openly
Monitor slot position: Keep track of your active set buffer - aim for 200+ slot cushion for safety
Improve performance metrics: Higher era points and better uptime attract stable, long-term nominators
Set competitive commission: Balance rewards to attract nominators without sacrificing your validator income
URGENT: Your buffer is critically low. Focus on attracting new nominators immediately

🐟Bluefin Tuna🐟 ✓ Reasonable Fair Poland, Warsaw (MEVSPACE sp. z o.o.)

Performance Metrics (Health: Fair)

Health-Based Risk Calculation

Formula

Health Score Breakdown (59.4/100)

💰 Reward Claims Status

Current Status

Last 30 Eras Timeline

Payment Speed

👥 Nominator Stability Analysis

Why Nominator Stability Matters

Nominator Tenure Breakdown

Current Risk Level

How to Improve Nominator Stability

⚠️ Active Set Risk Analysis

Worst-Case Scenario: If Biggest Nominator Leaves

Recent Nominator Behavior

How to Reduce Risk